A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

  • A History of Blank, Empty & MIssing Things: the Soul and “The” Heaven

    JF Ptak Science Books     Post 1839

    0 blog jan 29 soul missing

     

    Continuing a thread of interesting and odd observations of things that are empty, absent and disappeared are the following two images: the first, of the human soul; and the second, a picture of The Heaven. 

     

    The image above is a very spotty, molecular-like and modest image of the human soul, which seems to fill at least the outlines of the body, though there is a lot of nothingness in-between.  I’m not sure if the cloth, or sheet, is in front or behind the soul, or if the soul is impregnated into the object; I think that I’d rather believe it to be in front, placed there for whatever slim modesty it affords the gone person behind it.  This Outline (?), or  Depiction (?) is  found in Anima Hominis. (on pages. 88–9) from Charles Hoole’s English translation of Comenius’ Orbis Sensualium Pictus* published in 1659.

    The English translation of the Latin verse reads as follows: :

    The Soul is the life of the body, one in the whole: Only Vegetative in Plants. Withal sensitive in Animals; And also Rational in man.

    This consisteth in three things;

    In the understanding whereby it judgeth, and understandeth a thing good and evill, or true or apparent;

    In the will, whereby it chooseth, and desireth, or rejecteth or misliketh a thing known.

    In the Mind, whereby it pursueth the good chosen, or avoideth the evill rejected.

    Hence is hope, and Fear, in the desire and dislike;

    Hence is love and joy, in the fruition;

    But Anger, and Grief, in suffering.

    The true judgment of a thing is Knowledge; the false is Error, Opinion, and Suspicion.

    I found this image while looking for something entirely different, and was tremendously and wonderfully interrupted, at She-Philosopher. 

    0 blog jan 29 missing heaven Also, earlier in this same book (occupying pp 10–11) is plate IV, Coelum (“The Heaven”),  which as filled up with lines as it is still looks surprisingly empty–after all, no one’s home.

    You can click on the image for something large, or at least large enough to read the numbers hat are referred to in the verse.  Unfortunately, the number “4” towards the bottom-left just refers to this being the fourth illustration, and does not find a home in the text (another 4 being present within the circle of the engraving).  It would’ve been much more interesting had this extra-universal 4 referred to the whiteness around it, far removed from the depiction of what was thought to be the cosmos so neatly contained in the circles to its right.  .

    (I would like to point out that the use of the word “twinckle” toi describe starlight is about the earliest usage for the word that I’ve seen.)

    The English translation of the Latin verse reads:

    The Heaven 1. is wheeled about, and encompasseth the Earth 2. standing in the middle.

    The Sun 3. wheresoever it is shineth perpetually, howsoever dark Clouds 4. may take it from us; and by its rayes 5. it causeth light, and the light, Day.

    On the other side over against it is Darkness 6. and thence Night.

    In the Night, shineth the Moon, 7. and the Stars 8. glister, and twinckle.

    In the Evening 9. is Twilight, In the Morning, 10. the breaking, and dawning of the Day[.]

    *The lovely and very full title is actually as follwos:  Joh. Amos Commenii Orbis sensualium pictus. Hoc est, omnium fundamentalium in mundo rerum, & in vita actionum, pictura & nomenclatura. Joh. Amos Commenius’s Visible world, or, a picture and nomenclature of all the chief things that are in the world, and of mens employments therein. A work newly written by the author in Latine, and High-Dutch (being one of his last essays, and the most suitable to childrens capacities of any that he hath hitherto made) & translated into English, by Charles Hoole, teacher of a private grammar-school in Lothbury, London. For the use of young Latine-scholars. London: Printed for J. Kirton, at the Kings-Arms, in Saint Paules Church-yard, 1659.

  • Putting Black-and-White Back into Color: 1930’s Schoolrooms

    JF Ptak Science Books    Post 1840

    Its easy to assume a modern prejudice regarding the interior decoration of 1910-1940 school rooms, allowing a certain conceit and picturing them in shades of gray, the images formed being “colored” by the images of those things that we have seen, almost all of which have turned up in black-and-white photographs or movies. But of course we know that this can’t be true, and that Humphrey Bogart didn’t always wear a gray worsted in his movies, and didn’t move that gray suit through gray rooms. Its just that the image-formation is influenced by what we’ve seen, and since what we’ve seen of these rooms is mostly without color, then our images are difficult to assemble outside black-and-white.  This applies to just about everything from that era, which explains why it is such a glorious shock to see motion pictures or photographs of (say) New York City street scenes from 1944. (And why is it such a jolt to the visual system to learn that police cars in Chicago during the 1933 World’s Fair were orange?)

    This thinking came to the surface again this morning when I uncovered the Paint Specifications for the Model School, prepared for the East Cleveland Board of Education under supervision of the Foremost Authorities, and published by ARCO in 1939.  It reminds us that the only thing that lived in black-and-white in those days are in our memories.  (I’ve written about unexpected color in Lost German Color of 1927,  The Very Describale Macro Color of 1937, The Color Green in the History of Squares, and of course the non-immortal 200,000,000 Pounds of Buttocks-or-Putting the Black-and-White back into Color, and others.   [This item is available for purchase via our bookstore blog, here.]

    Color school587

    Color school592

    The rest of the ARCO catalog is below; but first, here’s a sample from the 200,000,000 Pounds of Butts post, showing the 1938 barroom in color:

    Mar 14 7th red bar

  • Daily Dose of Dr. Odd: Chronicle of the Plague, Florence, 1336

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

    The Florentine Chronicle on Medieval Plague Marchione di Coppo Stefani

    Marchione di Coppo Stefani was born in Florence in 1336. He wrote his Florentine Chronicle in the late 1370s and early 1380s.  [Stefani, Marchione di Coppo.Cronaca fiorentina. Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, Vol. 30. ed. Niccolo Rodolico. Citta di Castello: 1903-13.]

    “Rubric 643: Concerning A Mortality In The City Of Florence In Which Many People Died”

    “In the year of the Lord 1348 there was a very great pestilence in the city and district of Florence. It was of such a fury and so tempestuous that in houses in which it took hold previously healthy servants who took care of the ill died of the same illness. Almost non of the ill survived past the fourth day. Neither physicians nor medicines were effective. Whether because these illnesses were previously unknown or because physicians had not previously studied them, there seemed to be no cure. There was such a fear that no one seemed to know what to do. When it took hold in a house it often happened that no one remained who had not died. And it was not just that men and women died, but even sentient animals died. Dogs, cats, chickens, oxen, donkeys sheep showed the same symptoms and died of the same disease. And almost none, or very few, who showed these symptoms, were cured.

  • Daily Dose of Dr. Odd: Double Dose! Instructions and Regulations for Dealing with the Plague, 1338

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    Ordinances For Sanitation In A Time Of Mortality

    Pistoia was a provincial city of about 11,000 in the early fourteenth century located in the region of Tuscany, less than thirty kilometers northwest of Florence. Its government was in the hands of a small executive council made up of the Anziani or Elders of the People and the Standardbearer of Justice. The chief administrative officers were the Captain of the People and the Podesta who served six-month terms. They could not be Pistoian or even Tuscan. They were allowed limited social contact with Pistoians and their behavior was audited, or “syndicated” at the end of their terms of office. This allowed anyone who felt wronged by their actions to bring charges. The eight Anziani and the Standardbearer of Justice were citizens of the city selected by lot to serve two-month terms from among the citizens of the city who met age, professional and property qualifications. This small council debated all issues and made recommendations to a general city council, the Council of the People which was required either to approve or reject proposals without amendment. As will be clear from the ordinances, there were virtually no issues which affected life in the city which the government could not debate.

    The context of the Ordinances was the arrival of the Plague early in the Spring of 1348. Plague probably cost the city and surrounding countryside about one fourth of the total population. The statutes themselves reflect both the scientific knowledge and the practical issues which this crisis brought to a head.

    In the name of Christ Amen. Herein are written certain ordinances and provisions made and agreed upon by certain wise men of the People of the city of Pistoia elected and commissioned by the lords Anziani and the Standardbearer of Justice of the said city concerning the preserving, strengthening and protecting the health of humans from various and diverse pestilences which otherwise can befall the human body. And written by me Simone Buonacorsi notary. . . in the year from the Nativity of the Lord MCCCXLVIII, the first Indiction.

    First. So that no contaminated matter which presently persists in the areas surrounding the city of Pistoia can enter into the bodies of the citizens of Pistoia, these wise men provided and ordered that no citizen of Pistoia or dweller in the district or the county of Pistoia . . . shall in any way dare or presume to go to Pisa or Lucca or to the county or district of either. And that no one can or ought to come from either of them or their districts … to the said city of Pistoia or its district or county on penalty of £ 50 … And that gatekeeper of the city of Pistoia guarding the gates of the said city shall not permit those coming or returning to the said city of Pistoia from the said cities of Pisa or Lucca, their districts or counties to enter the said gates on penalty of £ 10 … It is licit, however, for citizens now living in Pistoia to go to Pisa and Lucca, their districts and counties and then return if they have first obtained a license from the Council of the People ….

  • Was Homer Color Blind? (1878)

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    “Colour Blindess in Relation to the Homeric Expressions for Colour”, from Nature Magazine, volume 18, p. 676, 1878.

    “In an article on “The Colour Sense” in the Number of the Nineteenth Century for October last, Mr. Gladstone points out certain peculiarities…in the expressions of colour used by Homer. “Although” he says “this writer has used light in various forms for his purposes with perhaps greater splendor and effect than any other poet, yet the colour adjectives and colour descriptions of the poems are not only imperfect but highly ambiguous and confused”. And again-“we find that his sense of colour was not only narrow, but also vague, and wanting in description”.

  • “Kill Sin Pimple” and other Religious Nicknames of the 17th Century

    JF Ptak Science Books    Post 1841

    Barebones601

    Who Is that man pointing and speaking from the preacher barrel? 

    This quaint woodcut appeared as the cover illustration to a pamphlet entitled A Word to Fanatics, Puritanism and Sectaries1; or, New Preachers New, and it answers my question: the screamer is Mr. Praise-God-Barebone who is attended by his attender, a more-commonly named Mr. Green (“the Feltmaker”), and is shown preaching to a small crowd, many of whom are shown with long faces and in deep caricature, more so to mirror words they are hearing.  Barebones is not presented in a friendly light, as the pamphlet was a warning to the general reader of the rising crowd of untrained and possibly heretical religicos who were gathering attention in and about London in the (Cromwellian fanatical) 1640’s.  They were seen as diffident, destructive, and definitely of the dimpled damaged variety of street entertainer. The interestingly-named pamphlet and Mr. Barebone was reported by the  magazine, The Mirrour, (July 19, 1823) as “the object of the work is to ridicule such persons without education undertake to expound the Scriptures, and who, ignorant themselves, have the vanity to pretend to teach others”. The powers that be were not amused.

    After dispatching the screamers The Mirrour then lists a number of very compelling and some-never-heard-of-before-by-me nicknames, like Barebone’s brother “Christ Came Into the World to Save” Barebone, followed by these examples: Accepted Trevor, of Norsham; Redeemed Compton, of Battle; Faint Not Hewit, of Hearthfield; Make Peace Heaton of Hare; God Reward Smart, of Firehurst; EarthAdms, of Warbleton; Called Lower of Warbleton; Kill Sin Pimple, of Witham; Return Spelman, of Watling; Fly Debate Roberts, Britling; Be Faithful Joiner, of Britling; Mare Fruit Fowler, of ast Hadley; Weep Not Billing, of Lewes; and Meek Brewer, of Okeham.  The magazine claims official records as the source for these names, but, well, who knows–perhaps the editors were just attempting to put a larger exclamation point on their biting article.

    These are extraordinary names in some ways similar to the passive reportage nastiness of H.L. Mencken’s nickname walk-through in his The American Language, but not quite so–in that book, the old problematic sage of Baltimore staggers his way through unbridled American enthusiastic for the common person’s testing and misunderstanding of English.  The religious  nicknames  seem more like baseball nicknames from the 1920’s, or earlier.  But of course these names predate those efforts by nearly 300 years.

    Somehow I’d like to see trading cards for these guys–although half-ancient that don’t give much leeway to their modern sports varieties.  Baseball has provided ceaseless though a little limited entertainment, tending sometimes toward the poetic overstatement (the Chairman of the Board, The Mighty Slider, The Great Significance) though it does get down to business in the ‘40’s and ‘50’s (the golden age of BB nicknames).  Here are a few examples, minus the racist stuff:  Pork Chop, Tater, Gummy, Whale, Pickles, Rawmeat, Spud, Bunny, Beast, Kitten, Possum, Slug, The Rat, Pudge, Tomato Face, Buttercup. (The most effective nicknames could’ve been made by combining two of the single names:  “Spud Rawmeat”, “Pudge Slug” or “Gummy Buttercup”, for example.)  There’s an awful lot of them dealing with food, and a whole heck of  a lot dealing with facial features; they all seem to outweigh ball playing ability, by far.  All this said, I do have a sweet pull for the religious nicknames. 

    Notes:

    1.  Sectraries:   members of a sect, especially those who belongs to a religious sect that is regarded as heretical or schismatic.

  • Daily Dose of Dr. Odd: the Future at the End of Burning Ash (Cigarette Card Visions)

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

    Three wonderful images of the future, brought to the viewer via the tobacco trading cards interests in the 1920’s–a future that could very well have been denied by the user of the product that advertised it. 
    Source: New York Public LIbrary Digital Collections, here.

    Aerodrome of the future.
    Aerodrome of the future.
  • Bits Towards an Alphabet of the Language of Flowers–Some Definitions of Flower Symbols

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

    photo

    I’ve put together a quick-and-dirty list of some interpretations of what the appearance of flowers may “mean”–-say in the hands of the subject of a painting, or as a gift, or a reference in a poem or piece of literature.  This in some ways reminds me of an earlier post on this blog, “An Unkindness of Ravens and a Murder of Crows”, here.

    Here’s a short list for further reading on the language of flowers:

    • Connolly, Shane. The Secret Language of Flowers, New York: Rizzoli International, 2004.
    • Edgarton, Miss S. C. The Flower Vase: Containing The Language of Flowers and Their Poetic Sentiments, Boston: Samual M. Dickinson, 1843
    • Greenaway, Kate. Language of Flowers, London: George Routledge and Sons, 1864.
    • Hale, Sarah. Flora’s Interpreter, and Fortuna Flora, Boston: Benjamin B. Mussey and Company, 1850.
    • Latour, Charlotte de.  Le langage des fleurs, 1830.
    • Lehner, Ernst. Folklore and symbolism of flowers, plants and trees, New York: Tudor Publishing Co. 1960.
    • Miller, Thomas. The Romance of Nature; or the Poetical Language of Flowers, New York: J.C. Riker, 1860
    • Powell, Claire. The Meaning of Flowers, Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala Publications, 1979.
    • Shoberl, Frderic. The Language of Flowers: With Illustrative Poetry; to which is Now First Added, the Calendar of Flowers  1830
    • Phillips, Henry. Floral Emblems, 1825.
    • Waterman, Catherine H. Flora’s lexicon: an interpretation of the language and sentiment of flowers : with an outline of botany, and a poetical introduction. 1855
    • Wirt, E.W. Flora’s Dictionary, Baltimore, 1855.

    and an overall history

    • Beverly Smeaton, The Language of Flowers–a very interesting book where Smeaton compares the various meanings for flowers among the five early and integral 19th century flower-symbolism folks, beginning on pp 167.  A link to a free read is here.

    Some samples of the very rich descriptions of the meaning of flowers:

    Almond, flowering – Concealed love.
    Althea, Frutex – I am deeply in love.
    Amaranth – Immortality, or piety.
    Anemone – Fading hope.
    Arbor-Vitae – Unchanging friendship.
    Auricula, Scarlet – Pride. You are proud.

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

    — —
  • On Paper Sculpting of Nothing

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 1842   (Continuing a post on The Importance of Nothing in the History of Blank, Empty and Missing Things thread.)

    Bug shells black595

    There is nothing quite so attractive sometimes as nothing.  Free, unused blank, empty space that can occur on a painting or in a print or on a green or red landscape or between notes in a piece of music;  the use of nothing, of blank space as an attenuator or a simple resting spot can be a critical element.

    Images from natural history, physical and medical sciences and encyclopediae can be extremely full with a hundred or more sections and not be crowded at all, though very full–other attempts at designing information display like this are far less successful, and become just crowded amalgams that remind us of badly articulated cabinets of curiosity.  Of course these things are not made to stand on their own and were to be used in conjunction with texts, but still, they seem to be strong enough to stand on their own.

    The blank spaces seem to occur more naturally on maps, in spite of the impulses of mapmakers (or at least their engravers) to fill the blank spaces with whatever might have been on hand–found or fictional or hypothesized landforms/animals/people/waves and such.  But some came quite naturally to the blank and free spaces, even in fictional maps, like the following (from Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726, amended 1735), or Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World, in Four Parts. By Lemuel Gulliver, First a Surgeon, and then a Captain of several Ships):

    000-ebay--Nov 4--gulliver996

                                                                                                  
      

    But these originally-occurring blank spaces are not why we’re here today.  As much as they can be beautiful, as in the following, as in this example of not filling up space by Louis Jean Pierre Vielliot in his 1805 work on natural history:

    Patti--WIWFY-Cover design Bird407

    What brings me to empty space tody is its pursuit in crowded images.  For example, the following image, a lovely and very crowded thing from the gorgeous encyclopedia by Abraham Rees, is made less crowded with some slight manipulation in photoshop, removing enough to cause the engraving to have a new and scrupulous interest in its missing bits and blank space:

    Bug593

     

  • Daily Dose of Dr. Odd: Blackboard Technology, 1850-1900

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    Einstein chalkboard
    What is there not to like in a blackboard?  Doing work on a blackboard is a definite commitment, thinking done out-loud, brain squeezings that you had to stand next to and own, creativity done on the fly with plenty of room for annotations.  And so how would you accommodate an expansion of the display of thought or instruction in the 19th century?  There were evidently plenty of ways around just having a big piece of slate on a  wall, as these U.S. Patent Office application/grant drawings will show. 

     

  • A Prehistoric Rayograph–a Proto-Example of Man Ray from 1810

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 1843

    “I have never painted a recent picture.” Man Ray, 1966

    “Unconcerned but Not Indifferent”—1976, Man Ray’s epitaph.

    Emmanuel Radnitzky (1890 –1976) removed the “Emm_uel”  and the “__dnitzk” from his names to become Man Ray, a South Philly-born, Brooklyn- and Manhattan-bred Parisian ex-Pat artist became (by the early 1920’s) perhaps the most influential of the Dadaist/modernist photographers. No offense to his given name, but “Man Ray” is superior.

    0 blog jan 27 man rayograph 1943 0 blog jan 27 man ray

     

    And Man Ray was far more than a photographer, as he worked across many different art forms, not the least of which was motion pictures.  But what comes to my mind first with his name is his self-titled “rayograph”, a photographic process which was actually a photogram, which was the direct exposure of an object placed upon a photosensitive paper.  This is also the earliest form of photography, something employed by Fox Talbot who called it “photogenic drawing”) as early as 1834.  (I wrote a little bit about this process in a post “Things That Almost Were But Weren’t”.) But Man Ray’s rayographs stand clear and distinct to me, different even from his contemporaries’ works (including Susan Derges, Max Ernst, Raoul Hausmann, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy and Alexander Rodchenko).  

    0 blog jan 27 man rayograph 2

     Of course my antiquarian pretender (the image on the above right) to the rayograph isn’t one—it just had the look and feel of one, contained that shock of recognition that I had seen it before, and the palce where I would’ve seen it was with Man Ray.  All I did with this engraving—an image of clockworks published in Abraham Rhee’s Encyclopedia of 1810–was to solarize it.  So it isn’t even a rayograph, but just looks like one, though Man Ray did work quite a bit with the solarized image.  I just like it. 

    0 blog jan 27 man ray 2

    This is the engraving in its “before” (and superior) state:

    0 blog jan 27durer459  

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories