A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

  • Reverse Memory, Synesthesia, and Modern Art (1880)

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2330

    I was very excited to bump into this article, ” reversals of Memory” in an 1880 issue of Nature magazine.1 Henslow2 (1835-1925) was an accomplished botanist, cleric, and Darwin correspondent who for years was a lecturer in botany at St. Bartholemew’s Hospital amongst much else in his long and accomplished career.  In the middle of it all he wrote this note in Nature which attracted my attention, though I think mostly for scifi aspects of the title, though the content is interesting, tending a little towards the brand new ideas of synesthesia. (Actually Francis Galton wrote about people who could “see” their process of mental arithmetic in their minds while calculating–this is seen as one of the earliest published efforts in synesthesia. I wrote about this article–which appeared in January of 1880 in the same publication–here about 3,000 posts ago.) It refers to a painter who painted J.M.W. Turner’s  The Fighting Temeraire (completed 1839) from memory, but who had very curiously reversed the positions of what sounded like all of the elements of the painting.  I’ve reproduced the article below and included the Turner:

    Temerairee tner[Image source: Wikiart.org]

    This may well be more symbolic about the reversed memory here, with the Turner and all. Turner was at the forefront of the pre-Impressionists, or so it seems to me, what with so much of his work headed into symbolist and suggestive territory, impressionistically, as with the detail we see of the setting sun:

    Temeraire sunPerhaps it really can be seen as a reversal of memory…that is, the Impressionists come along soon afterwards and begin to paint things that are suggestive of hard elements, this after many centuries of human endeavor to perfect a true representation of the world around them.  Suddenly, by the half or 3/4s of the 19th century, there is a movement away from this, of losing and replacing detail with something that suggested it. And by the time Kandinsky roles around in 1911,  painting with no factual representational elements in them at all, it seems that the memory business of modern painting has been completely changed, or challenged.  So, the Turner may be very appropriate in this case after all…


    Reversals by Memory
    "I SHOULD much like to know if it be a common thing for people to reverse the positions of objects in the memory. An artist, on returning from the National Gallery, painted the Temeraire from memory. Taking his picture to compare it with Turner's, he found to his surprise that he had reversed the positions of the ship, tug, sun, &c. His daughter tells me that if she wants to refer to a passage in a book she as often looks for it on a left-hand page, while it is on a right-hand page, or vice versa. Another lady, on looking at a wood-engraving made from a sketch which she had seen some time previously, asked if the engraver had not reversed everything? These are the only cases known to me. Is the following universally true? — Let some one write with a blunt instrument the letter P on your forehead, or anywhere on the front half of the head from ear to ear, and the P must be written backwards for you to "see" it correctly. But if it be written anywhere at the back of the head, it must be written correctly both for you and the writer to read it. The change takes place abruptly in a line over each ear."

     –text of the Henslow from the Victorian Review, vol 5, “Outposts of the Most Advanced Physics”, p 667, by H. Mortimer Franklyn, editor. 

    Notes:

    1. HENSLOW, George. “Reversals of Memory” in Nature, July 15, 1880, short note on page 241. 

    2. [Henslow: “Clergyman, teacher, and botanist. BA, Cambridge (Christ’s College), 1858. Curate of Steyning, 1859–61; of St John’s Wood Chapel, 1868–70; of St James’s Marylebone, 1870–87. Headmaster at Hampton Lucy Grammar School, Warwick, 1861–4; at the Grammar School, Store Street, London, 1865–72. Lecturer in botany at St Bartholomew’s Hospital, 1866–80.”–Darwin Correspondence Project. Remembered as “the Cambridge mentor” of Charles Darwin

  • The Phonic Graphing Phonograph of Fleeming Jenkin, 1878

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2331

    Fleeming Jenkin was a very considerable man with a huge range of interests and talents, along the lines of a William Thomson/Stanley Jevons.  His main deal though and the place where he earned his keep was in engineering, and here he was virtuosic.  I call him up now because of an article that appeared in the 1878 issue of Nature magazine, entitled “The Phonograph”.  The instrument was invented by Edison in 1877 (and patented in February 1878)–it was an extraordinary thing with great promise, though not so much in the ways we think of today. In any event, Jenkin was able to produce one for himself–to reverse engineer it–from descriptions he read of the machine in the newspapers, which is a big accomplishment.  

    What he set to do with it was impressive–he began to study the components of speech. And not just by audio comparison–he devised a method to make transverse sections of the recording wax so that they could be magnified and allow him to study the visual differentiations made by speech in the medium.  Now that is very good–making the phonograph into a phonic graphing machine.  

    Here’s the article, written by Alexander J. Ellis, as it appeared in the May 9, 1878 issue of Nature:  

  • Gin Lane, the Moral Thermometer, and Booze Crazes

                    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 2332

     “…the Distillers have found out a way to hit the palate of the Poor, by their new fashion’d compound Waters called Geneva, so that the common People seem not to value the French-brandy as usual, and even not to desire it”. –Daniel Defoe The Complete English Tradesman, 1727, volume 2, page 91.

    Hogarth gin lane

    [Source: the British Museum, here.]

    I was moved to this post after reading a wonderful piece by Rebecca Onion at Slate Vault on an infographic/metaphorical social thermometer of drinking and temperance, a beautiful engraving published in 17971. (See here.) [Another, illustrated, version can be found at the College of Physicians, London, site, here.]

    It reminded me of another great and iconic image regarding the evil of drink—it appeared earlier in the century, at a more difficult time in the history of London drunkenness. It is the William Hogarth’s Gin Lane, published in 1751. I’m not sure what drove Hogarth to the subject matter—except of course he was a societal reporter, making art of what he saw, turning him observations of everyday street and cultural life in to parables. Certainly he needed go far to find subject material like this.

    As we can see he only had to go as far as Bloomsbury (in the background and the tower of St. George towering) to find the location of his stage. The characters are well established, showing us in this unfolding tragedy a scene of drunken depravity and wantonness, of lechery, and forgetfulness, illness, crime, and death, all brought on by the continuing increase in gin and other alcohol consumption. But mainly gin. Gin was cheap, was sold everywhere, and was very effective. It was a disease, really, that affected London deeply throughout much of the 18th century, though the greatest part of the gin craze took place earlier in the century. Some of the problem was ameliorated by several governmental acts that interested with the sale of gin, though the major part of it occurred in the Gin Act of 1751, which was created to restructure the distribution of gin and make I more difficult (and expensive) to purchase—the logic of the move wasn’t so much to convince the public not to drink gin, but to make it more difficult to buy the drink.

    So gin was in the air, for sure—literally, and figuratively.

    Hogarth attacked it. The most arresting figure for me is the scabbied drunken (syphalitic ?) mother in the middle foreground, passing out or wasting away, completely unconscious to the plight of her baby, falling, desperately, to certain major injury or death into a stairwell, without the attention of the mother, a vignette that is horrible and striking. At her feet is a starving skeleton, asleep or dead, dead or asleep, in a miserable state, although he does have a nice wicker basket with a bottle in it. This may be an allusion to Death from the Renaissance (and earlier) illustrations and depictions of Death coming to people at their play or profession—the Dance of Death, only this Death isn’t dancing, it is only dying.

    There’s no relief in this print—an almost-calming scene at mid-left midground is Gripe’s pawnbroker, the jaw-thrusting and disapproving proprietor assaying the tools of a man (a carpenter?) while a woman waits her turn, her pots in hand, waiting to pawn the stuff of existence or work. The three balls of the pawnshop’s sign form a sort of upside down crucifix, which via a perspective tick hangs just above the steeple of St. George’s. Under this cross all sorts of hellish behavior takes place.

    At mid-right we find the distiller, with a big, ruddy, rheumy and raucous crowd in front of it, swinging chairs and crutches, close set, and depicted in such a way that you know everyone reeks.

    In the upper right, forgotten, a man is seen hanging by the neck, a probable suicide, dead. Next door to his ruin house is a stable one, an undertaker’s shop, with a sample of wares hanging as a sign—no doubt doing a decent business, though it seems as though any money left for coffins in these folks would’ve been drunk up a long time ago. To complete this architectural scene the house on the corner is collapsing, much like everything else.

    Then in the gentle mist we see the coffin and body, and the men either putting the body in or taking it out—I think the viewer can choose for themselves which.

    This image is the opposite of subtle, though you need to look for the messages a little; once found, they are forever present. Mr. Hogarth got his point across. 

    NOTES:

    1.  Lettsom, John Coakley, 1744-1815.History of some of the effects of hard drinking: The sixth edition. By J. C. Lettsom, …  The illustrations in question is “A MORAL AND PHYSICAL THERMOMETER; OR, A SCALE of the Progress of TEMPERANCE and INTEMPERANCE. LIQUORS, with their EFFECTS, in their usual Order”.  Summarizing, some drinking led to good health and tolerance; other sorts, not. The “Vices” perpetrated by the Bad Drink included the following: Idleness; Peevishness; Quarrelling; Fighting; Lying; Swearing; Obscenity; Swindling; Perjury; Burglary; Murder; Suicide. And the “Illnesses” associated with Bad Drink”: Sickness; Puking, and Tremors of the Hands in the Morning; Bloatedness; Inflamed Eyes; Red Nose & Face; Sore and swelled Legs; Jaundice; Pains in the Limbs, and burning in the Palms of the Hands, & Soles of the Feet; Dropsy; Epilepsy; Melancholy; Madness; Palsy; Apoplexy;Death. The social and economic onsequences: Debt; Black-Eyes; Rags; Hunger; Hospital; Poor-house; Jail; Whipping; The Hulks; Botany Bay; Gallows.

  • Feynman on Symmetry

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    Richard Feynman wrote this about symmetry in section 52 of the first volume of his Lectures in Physics (1963) the three volumes now beautifully available online at CalTech here. The last two paragraphs are also quoted in Mario Livio’s “The Equation that Couldn’t Be Solved”, Martin Gardiner in “The Ambidexterous Universe”, and many other places, probably hundreds of times; I’ve included the previous two paragraphs for interest’s sake.  Feynman, the symmetry master, included a statement about a beautiful gate in “Neiko” Japan, which must “Nikko”, though I can hardly identify the gate that he was talking about.  There seem to be many–see the UNESCO Shrines and Temples of Nikko, here–though the candidate in my mind is the extraordinary Yomeimon gate, here. 

    52–9  Broken symmetries

    “The next question is, what can we make out of laws which are nearly symmetrical? The marvelous thing about it all is that for such a wide range of important, strong phenomena—nuclear forces, electrical phenomena, and even weak ones like gravitation—over a tremendous range of physics, all the laws for these seem to be symmetrical. On the other hand, this little extra piece says, “No, the laws are not symmetrical!” How is it that nature can be almost symmetrical, but not perfectly symmetrical? What shall we make of this?…”

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

  • Good Infographic: the Length and Footprint of Trans-Atlantic SHips, 1840-1900

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    This is just a very quick posting of an interesting bit of data that I stumbled across while looking for William Ferrel’s tide predicting machine in the May 3, 1902 issue of Scientific American.  I should say it it an unusual piece of info, showing the lengths of trans-oceanic ships and utilizing their plan to locate it on the graph: Ship plans349
      One thing is for certain:  the Great Eastern was a beast–the Titanic would be 192′ longer than this, and the QEII and USS Enterprise another 300′ longer than that.  

    The designer of the Great Eastern, Isambard Kingdon Brunel, was pictured against the very impressive launching chains of the ship, seen here in this iconic photograph by Robert Howlett in 1857. (Howlett tragically died at a very young 27 just at the beginning of a brilliant and innovating career.)

    SHip Bunel

  • Misty Formaldehyde Cocoons, 1899

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post  2332 (expanding an earlier post from 2009)  Blog Bookstore


    Gustave de Rechter, the author of this pamphlet (The Application of a New System for the Preservation of Dead Bodies, Grammont, Belgium, 1899) had, as you might guess, a very specific reason for keeping the dead from being entirely, decomposedly, dead.  As the director of the School of Criminology and of Scientific Police of Belgium, Dr. de Rechter tried to find a way of preservation of bodies for forensic and legal purposes.

    +()+ebay dead bodies blog

    He  followed  in the footsteps of people like Alphonse Bertillon (France) and Hans Gross (Austria) in helping to establish a scientific basis for criminology in the late 19th century. In his case, the preservation of the dead would allow the bodies (of the murdered or suspiciously departed) to be re-examined at a much later date (at least months down the road) should the defense in a murder case challenge the original findings of the medical examiner. 

    +()+ebay dead bodies photo1

    As de Rechter points out, this was particularly true in the case of poisoning, where in 1899 the evidence would be all but dissipated
    from the body following even a week of death—he maintains that his new method of preservation (via an incubated spray of formic aldehyde, or formaldehyde) would enable further inspection even months after death. De Rechter manages to forestall the inevitable, the great crumbling that awaits everything, everyone, at some point, the “distinguished thing” of Henry James’ (last words), to return everything to the earth, to what Larry McMurtry (in Lonesome Dove) refers to as “nothing but a boneyard”. 

    +()+ebay dead bodies photo2

    (The images here are from the pamphlet, with de Rechter showing the effects of his nasty spray on corpses and what they looked like after some months sleeping in their formaldehyde cocoons.)

     

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

  • A Quartet of Mathematical Gymnasts (1867)

    "A QUARTETTE OF MATHEMATICAL GYMNASTS. "
    
    This is a pretty devastating review of the work of four mathematicians/engineers that 
    appeared in the Scientific American on May 6, 1867:
    The article concludes: “We have a few other mathematical acrobats on our list, but as their summersaults were turned on another stage, we will not mention them at the present time, but we hope be- fore long to place them before the readers of the Scientific American. We will briefly observe, however, that one of them is not a thousand miles from the Navy Department, and he is still, we believe, accumulating figures with extraordi- nary cunning and industry.” It is pretty cutthroat beginning-to-end: "The errors which have lately been made in calculating the power of projectiles, the resistance of armor plates, and the force of steam vessels when used as rams, seem to indicate that a knowledge of first principles is more necessary for a correct appreciation of mechanical problems than any amount of abstract mathematical skill..."

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

  • The Mental Sorrows of Left-Handedness (1924)

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    Nature (September 13, 1924) posted a long one-paragraph description of the work of Dr. William.S. Inman (1876-1968), who published an article in the Lancet on the causes of left-handedness, stammer, and squint, which he found were related in one form or another, and globally.  Just in case you were wondering, Dr. Inman located the causes of the problems of left-handnedness, and his were devoted “to mental causes”:

    • Left-handedness, stammering, and squinting are all caused by emotional stress;
    • “too severe parenting” can be the cause of stammering, and left-handedness, and squinting;
    • each of these “defects runs in families”;
    • a family predisposed to one is so with the other two;
    • one can become lefthanded as “an unconscious revolt against authority”.

    So, there. 

    This at least seems like a gentle and inquisitive approach to left-handedness, which, it seems, was a “defect” that historically was dealt with by corporal punishment.  For example, in the first book I can find in the global library catalog WorldCat that mentions “left-handedness”–a work by Thomas Lutpon with the long and languid title of A Thousand Notable Things containing modern curiosities. Viz. Divers Rare and Experienc’d Physical Receipts… To Educate Children to learn languages speedily…Also a new help to discourse, and directions to read, write, indite and speak languages readily and speedily…, a note is found with the description of the book saying “21st edition of this book of secrets, first published in 1586, it contains “A New Method to Educate Children” pp. 153-163 with a woodcut of alphabet cubes. The 20th edition appeared in 1706./ Some of the recipes are innocuous, others simply terrifying — in spite of this, the author’s instructions for educating children are surprisingly humane — no corporal punishment and notably, no beating to correct left-handedness”.  Now the purpose of that very long and not-so-pretty sentence was to get aross the idea that for long periods of time left-handedness was treated as something that could be beat out of someone, physically.  That at least is one very disturbing way of teaching someone how to write with their right hand.  

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

  • The Hearing-Aid Chair, 1837

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

     

  • The Computational Future-World of 1902, a Dozen Years Old

    JF Ptak Science Books

    This is sort of what the future of tabulation looked like in 1902–except that the people in this year were already living in this tabulating future, surprisingly already a dozen years old at this point. The cover illustrates an article on the machinery used in the production of statistics and tables and general data organization by the great work by Herman Hollerith, who had already performed this function for the U.S. Census of 1890.  (Hollerith had offices at Wisconsin Avenue and the C & O Canal, in Georgetown, D.C., about ten blocks from where my old store used to be at Volta & 33rd.)

    Hollerith 1902

    The 1880 census had cost about $6 million and took 9 years to tabulate; the 1890 census using the Hollerith machines cost $10 million and took seven years.  The main focus of many in government was the cost differential—not the incredible amounts of new controllable information.  The rent of the Hollerith machines was only $750,000 for the conduct of the entire census, so the differential must’ve been in the extra utility costs (for electricity, for example, which was used for the first time to run the tabulators) and for the small army of statisticians and data entry people.  Be that as it may, the government was not amused, particularly when Hollerith figured that he had actually saved the government $5 million.    The two parties left each other grumbling, though the roar of the trickle down from the Hollerith success drowned it out.  The tabulating system was quickly exported, and large private concerns in the U.S. saw a savior in the system that would soon rescue them from the sea of paper in which they were beginning to drown.   The Hollerith company did very, very well for itself, and soon merged with three other companies (in 1911) to ease the burden of success.  The resulting company was called the Computing-Tabulating-Research Company (CTR), which after a short while became the International Business Machine Corporation (IBM).   

    [Source of abstract: Publications Indexed for Engineering, PIE, volume 4.]

    And the article from the Scientific American, as follows. (It is worth pointing out that a few hundred pages following is an article about William Terrel’s fantastic tide-predicting machine, a beast of a sicentific instrument that weighed in at 2,500 pounds and functioned slendidly for 30+ years…)

     

  • History of Lines: the Big Little Lines of Richard Feynman (1949)

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2333

    Perhaps the only bigger five put-together lines than Feynman diagrams may be home plate; otherwise I’m hard pressed to come up with a better thing that can be drawn in this way with this many lines.  

    The impossibly smart Richard Feynman (1918-1988, Nobel in 1955 for the development of quantum electrodynamics; physics of superfluidity; path integral formulation of QM, etc.) worked on a schematic that would  visualize quantum electrodynamical interactions, the scattering calculations in QFT describing interactions between particles The result is known by nearly everyone on earth as Feynman diagrams. (Murray Gell-Mann, another Nobelist and ueber diligent partner and competitor of Feynman’s, and perhaps as influential a physicist (with the Eightfold Way and etc.), refers to the diagrams as (Ernst) Stuckelberg diagrams, named for a once-obscure physicist who, among others, came up with an early schemata closely resembling Feynman diagrams.)  They are an elegant and powerful redistribution of complex arrangements that are more easily calculated when visualized.

     

    Dsc00016

    The images here are the first time the diagrams were published, and are found in the 15 September 1949 issue of the Physical Review after having been introduced in conference and class work (at Cornell int eh 1948/1949 QED course that Feynman taught there). They are among the top-10 prettiest pictures in physics of the 20th century.

    Their descriptive power is matched only by their crystalline simplicity—few diagrams have ever been constructed with a greater claim.

    Dsc00015

     

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

    —

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories