A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

A Great Letter to the Editor & a Major Advance in Particle Physics

JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2091

James Chadwick–the discoverer of the neutron and leading Brit investigator in the Manhattan Project–announced his great discovery in the form of a letter-to-the-editor.  Of course, this was a letter to the editor of Nature–not exactly the Billboard Breeze of Sumpin’, Montana, or the NYT or WSJ for that matter–where letters like this were more a quick way to get experimental results announced quickly, a rapid-publication device in the days when the scientific weekly was the quickest way of getting news out the fellow researchers. 

But, no matter–it is still a short introduction to a long idea, not quite as romantic as the lede implies.  Chadwick’s  “Possible Existence of a Neutron”, appeared in Nature on 27 February 1932. It takes up a tidy and compact  1.25 columns, all on one page (312) of this issue of the journal. It is in a sort of imaginary “tradition” of great letters-to-the-editor, like the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow paper (“The Origin of Chemical Elements”, on the stuff of the Big Bang, a 1948 paper published in the journal Physical Review that worked out the basis for the formation of particles in the universe), another instance of a major scientific announcement being made as a “simple” presentation to the journal’s editor. 

·Posted by :

·in:

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories