A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

History of Holes: Lakes and Holes and Imaginary Tears

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

This engraving was very nearly very interesting–I mean, it is interesting in that it shows the shapes of lakes together on a single sheet of paper, their shapes presented devoid of any other non-lakes.  Its really quite an arresting presentation, and coming at a relatively early time in presenting data in this fashion.  What the engraving doesn’t relate, unfortunately, is the size of the lakes relative to one another. 

LAkes161

And if the lakes were to be presented proportionally, Lake Geneva (surface area of 225 miles2 would be quite a speck compared to the likes of the Great Lakes, and Lake Superior (31,000 miles2) would speck-ish compared to the great Caspian (clocking in at 152,000 miles2). 

This graphic appears still in the first decade or so of cartographic physical attributes being placed together, and was published in 1865 in the Popular Science Monthly. 

Blogjuly_19_comparative_big_colton Here we go with a good representation of an engraving (above), this from 1856 and which may have been the first time that these 150+ lakes and islands of  the Western and Eastern Hemisphere were ever been printed on the same  page and in the same scale exclusive of their associative land masses  and placed contiguously, side-by-side.  They were, of course, seen in a  common perspective before on any world map, but I think that this is the  first year in which the islands and lakes of the world were displayed  without oceans and land masses, and the effect is a little odd.  If you  take away the color and the text the image takes on a very definite  biological flavor (I keep thinking of that tiny bone in the ear for the  small lakes…)  In any event it is far easier to compare these features  without the distractions of the non-lakes and non-islands clouding and  confusing our perspective fields.

The largest lakes, here.

And as long as we’re at, let’s have a look at the first image inverted, which gives the lakes a good healthy dose of anthropomorphism via imaginary rips, tears, moth- and bullet-holes.

LAkes inverted

 

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories