A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

On Teaching the Concept of What a Number “Is”–1929 vs. 2012

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

At first glance this math teaching tool looks a little on the obvious/antique/useless side, but I think that there are some good points to it in helping small children understand the concept of what a number “is” and relating the processes of addition and subtraction to the relationship of “numbers” to “things”.

And as the inventor points out

and so on…

This certainly seems more beneficial and utilizable than the current practice in my daughter’s third grade class, where a simple subtraction problem is turned into a double addition problem employing a number line, all in the name of teaching the children the concept of “number” and doing away with algorithms.  I think that by the third grade, the concept of “number” has been established, though the board of edu-selection might be trying  to re-visit a lost point of development somehow.

So with my daughter’s class,take  the problem 456-345=    ______

This is made intoan addition problem,  345+ ____= 456.

The addition problem is turned into a number line, with 345 on the left far end and 456 on the right. 

The children are told to add the requisite bits to 345 to get to a “zero unit” for each place value, and then add those for the solution to the problem. 

So:  345+5= 350, 350+50=400; 400=50=450; 450+6+456.  Add the 5+50+50+6= 111.

In this confusion a stab at the heart of understanding the concept of “number” has beenb made. 

A step back from this would be a wise move to make.

 

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories