A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many othr places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

An Alphabet of Fire–Night-time Telegraphy, 1800 vs. the 1991 Pen Ashtray

JF Ptak Science Books     Post 1510

Blog1sept_6_palpable514

This curious illustration appears in forty-five volume Cyclopedia of  Abraham Rees (published 1795-1820), displaying a system for communicating over distances at night.  When this part of the Cyclopedia was printed in 1808, the electrical telegraph as we now it was still 37 years away from coming into being–45 years from being somewhat well-used.  Before this time (visual) communications over long distances at night were limited to just these sorts of means–lighted semaphores, hand-held torches, that sort of thing.  Signaling at sea at night was somewhat different at this time and didn’t include anything remotely close to the alphabet.  So the rather complex system that we see at left is extremely uncommon–it seems also very cumbersome to put into effect. 

Unfortunately I don’t have the text volume that would explain then entire system and implementation, so I’m going to guess that there was a large, powerful light source that was covered by a tight, black, covering tablet that would eliminate nearly all light leakage.  The symbols for each letter of the alphabet (and numerals) would be cut out from another tablet that would fit over the face of the light source, placed between the blank and the light.  To transmit a letter the user would then simply remove the blank covering tablet to reveal the light broadcast by the hole or slit in the tablet underneath.  The blank would then be placed back, a new tablet for a new letter placed underneath, and the process would begin again:  blank (dark); letter (light); blank (dark); letter (light), and so on to the end of the message.   I guess the distance at which these symbols could be seen would be dependent on light source, atmospheric conditions, ad so on.  The way that the letters are made into symbols seems to me very intelligent, so that you distinguish the differences from an appreciable distance.  I like it–its an elegant idea.  (Well, maybe it didn’t work in this manner, but it seems to make sense to me.)

One can only imagine what the early 19th-century mind would think if they saw this sort of fire-writing device, and how the progress of the history of technology came to produce such a thing:

 

Now, does someone look at the pen ashtray and think, “I NEED one of those!”, or what?   To me it represents one of those representatives in the Humans-are-as-Soft-as-Soup category.

Here’s another sort of fire writing, more literal and of course much less applicable, unless you were recording the writing with a stop-action camera:

 

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories