A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

Thinking about the History of Pockets and Pocketbooks

JF Ptak Science Books   Post 1067

I’ve known about this photo for a long time—a picture of a
willed, powerful woman stepping up to an (early, interesting)  microphone to perform:  that would be Dame Nellie Melba, the prima donna from Australia, singing at the Chelmsford Marconi works on 15 June 1920 in the first-ever-advertised broadcast entertainment.   Weirdly, 
what has always struck me about this is the handbag. The pocketbook.  Why didn’t she put it down to sing? 


Pocketbook161

Its not a big question, really, especially if you look at
the pocketbook as just a pocket that you hold—an irony in itself, a displayed
thing holding concealed things.

The pocket, or handbag, or purse or pouch goes back a long
way, thousands of years.  But for this
scant view of the history of the pocketbook the action begins in the 14th
century or so, when pouches with drawstrings were used to haul this and that,
attached to the exterior girdle of the clothing of men and women alike.  These exterior pockets were switched to the
interior in the 16th and 17th century (or so) given the
new and voluminous articles and layers of clothing that were in fashion—there
was so much material that the girdle or belt could be worn under the clothing
with the pouches attached to them there. 
Of course if you didn’t have a lot of clothing to wear—like these guys
in Brueghel’s “Two Elders” , you’d be
wearing your pouches still on the outside, this in the manner of K Street bike
messengers. 

And so by the end of the 18 th c fashion was flayed with the
curse and rumor of revolution—people wore less layered and puffy clothing, and the
pouches returned again, though aided in a short while by the invention of what we  know and recognize today as the modern
pocket.  The pocket would at first be a
simple slit in the clothing to get to the hanging, girdle/belted dangling
pocket, and then after Something Happened the pouch would be attached to the slit.
Voila.

The pocketbook that we think of today came into being in the
mid/late 19th century—just a few decades really before this photo
was made—and that article of necessity hasn’t looked back since.  It seems to me that the pocketbook of the 19th
century might’ve been an advertising platform too for marketing marriagability—the
bags were often finely decorated/embroidered, which would show in effect a
particular domesticity skill.  And then
of course the bags just held stuff, too. 
It would be interesting to see a collection of the preserved contents of
handbooks by the decade for 150 years or so—just the contents spilled into a
bag and preserved, a version of “the Things They Carried With Them”. 

I have no idea about the evolution of the interior pockets
of pockets in pocketbooks.

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories