JF Ptak Science Books Picture Post
-
History of Blank, Empty, and Missing Things: Fission. 1934
JF Ptak Science Books Post 1689

“it is conceivable that the nucleus breaks up into several large fragments, which would of course be isotopes of known elements but would not be neighbors of the irradiated element.“–Ida Noddack, 1934
Sometimes events and conspire to almost come together, to be very-nearly-there but not so, just this shy of complete, just a little short of being whole–save for inspiration, or insight, or genius. Such I think is the case of Ida Noddack (and just about everyone else) in the non-discovery of fission in 1934.
Just for the record, fission is properly discovered by Hahn/Strassmann/Meitner and announced in Naturwissenschaften beginning in 1935 (with “Ueber die kuensrtliche Umwandlunbg des Urans durch Neutronen” in 1935 and culminating in the epochal papers of 1939)–and this the result of a long series of necessary discoveries made by Becquerel, Einstein, Curie, Joliot, Bohr, Chadwick, Compton, Fermi, Frisch, Rosbaud, Wheeler, Alvarez and others.
Noddack published her paper–“Uber das Element 93” in Angewandte Chemie (vol 47, pp 653-655) in 1934 (and published in Berlin) which correctly pointed out errors in Fermi’s important two-page 1934 paper on neutron bombardment experiments “Possible Production of Elements of Atomic Number Higher than 92”, published in Nature 133 (3372), pp 898-899. She identified as inconclusive Fermi’s identification of transuranic products of neutron bombardment, and stated that the presence of all of the lower elements needed to eliminated along with the heavy radioactive elements. Noddack (1896-1978) was nominated three times for the Nobel (chemistry) but was passed by–she received recognition for her work, of course, but at the time- (1934) her paper was generally ignored, as it ran counter to some of the basic ideas of physics Noddack didn’t offer any theoretical help in her observations, and the paper slid almost instantly into obscurity. The breakthrough work on this issue would begin int he next year and ultimately the unthought-of concept of fission would be announced five years later.
-
Future Punk–Extreme Wright Biplane-ism in Skiing
-
-
History of Dots Series: How Much Does the Earth Weigh? (1798)
JF Ptak Science Books Post 1690 [Part of the History of Dots series: Weighing Earth’s Biggest Dot–Itself.]
Archimedes said that given certain conditions and equipment that he could lift the Earth with a lever; he did not, however, have the necessaries to actually determine how much the whole thing “weighed”, and would have to wait for 20 centuries in the work of Henry Cavendish to have an answer. (Archimedes was a very busy man with an enormous list of contributions, and was perhaps the greatest physicist and mathematician of his age in the third century BCE, but he did not invent the lever–he did however provide the mathematical understanding and formalization of how the thing worked in his “On the Equilibrium of Plane Figures”.)



In this experiment, “Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth”, the results of which appeared in the Philosophical Transactions in 17981, the great and somewhat mysterious (and odd) Henry Cavendish determined to, of all things, weigh the Earth. (Well, really it was measuring the force of gravity and finding the gravitation constant G, which Cavendish referred to as the specific weight of the Earth.) Now there are certain remarkable things to be achieved in the 18th century (like for example the discovery of oxygen by Scheele/Priestly), and of course the idea of measuring the weight of the Earth was a high intellectual achievement. Cavendish set off to measure the force of attraction between large and small lead balls using as a basis for research parts of his dead friend John Michell’s designs for a torsion balance (which he had created in 1783), and using of course Newton’s laws showing that the force of gravity between two objects depends on their masses as well as the distance between them. Michell had thought of the experiment years before but died before he could present; Cavendish carried on and up, and out. Mind he wasn’t the first on the spot (Coloumb was there too slightly before Michell), or the first with the idea–he was the first to complete it, though, taking the difference in the measures on the very sensitive balance from a distance using a telescope so as to not disturb the readings. As a matter of fact this was the only method employed to conduct this experiment for nearly another hundred years, the results being confirmed by a number of scientists2 over the coming decades. It was a lovely idea, and a fantastic piece of work.
In his paper in the Philosophical Transactions, Cavendish described Michell and the instrumentation int he opening two paragraphs:
The instrument:
This is the test apparatus that Cavendish constructed following the original Michell plans–it was a big, solid instrument, as that horizontal piece suspended fro the rod (K) is six feet long, and those two spheres (W) attached to its ends are 350-pounds apiece. The smaller sphere is located in the box to the side of the large sphere, as so:
“Henry Cavendish had fitful habits of publication that did not at all reveal the universal scope of his natural philosophy. He wrote no books and fewer than twenty articles in a career of nearly fifty years. Only one major paper was theoretical, a study of electricity in 1771; the remainder of his major papers were carefully delimited experimental inquiries, the most important of which were those on pneumatic chemistry in 1766 and 1783–1788, on freezing temperatures in 1783–1788, and on the density of the earth in 1798.” (D.S.B. III:155).
________
Notes:
1. A copy of the first German edition of this work is available at our blog’s bookstore: “Versuche über die Dichtigkeit der Erde zu Bestimmen.” Halle, Rengerschen Buchhandlung, 1799, and published in Annalen der Physik, herausgegeben von Ludwig Wilhelm Gilbert, band. 2, erstes stück. 120pp in this section, 488pp overall in in the entire volume, with 9 plates. Cavendish’s paper occupies pp 1-62, with two plates (the torsion balance of Michell shown on the plates).
The entire Cavendish paper can be found here: Cavendish, Henry (1798). “Experiments to Determine the Density of the Earth”. In MacKenzie, A. S.. Scientific Memoirs Vol.9: The Laws of Gravitation. American Book Co.. 1900. pp. 59–105 Online copy of Cavendish’s 1798 paper, and other early measurements of gravitational constant.
2. The experiment was in fact repeated numerous times, including that by Reich (1838), Baily (1843), Cornu & Baille (1878), among others, and it wasn’t until 1895–the year of Roentgen’s epochal discovery–that Cavenidsh’s accuracy was exceeded by the work of C.V. Boys.
-
A Bloated Alphabet of Fat Cures: Strychnine Pills, Vibrators and Hope.
JF Ptak Science Books Post 1691 Part of the Series on Blank, Empty and Missing Things: Promises.
Quackery in general has survived in spite of itself over many fields, not the least of which is astrology and creation “science”, cults, religions, and walking-with-the-dead. In the U.S. in the 1910-1925 period however there was a attempt at investigating the most outrageous frauds in the medical profession by the American Medical Association, and of the many sorts of quacks and frauds-liver cures, neuralgia miracles, electro-vibrator hair restorers and lump removers, anti-droopy happiness pills, cocaine nervous system remedies, and so on–what I’d like to look at right now is concerned with “flesh reduction”, or fat cures. 
[Photograph of a neon sign, Manhattan, 1941, by Weegee from Naked City.]
According to the AMA (in a 1934 retrospective) the chief stimulant to the obesity industry was the rise of womens’ fashions. I think that the reasoning might wind itself around the growth of expendable money in the American rising middle class, where Americans, in general, had more money to spend on the non-essentials than any time in the history of the country. That leads to more consumables, and that leads to more advertising, and that leads to more idealized images of what people should look like, and that leads to wanting to look like that, and that opens the door to scammers who offer a way to get to the not-actual ideal without effort and for little money. And so in the ’20’s there was a spike in quack remedies for obesity, as there was little or no control over the content of what was being sold nor the claims about what the product did, medically speaking-there was general protection from fraud, of course, but the medical compliment for establishing what that actually was wasn’t quite yet in place.
There is a veritable alphabet (soup) of mondo bizarre cures that the AMA attacked and ripped apart during the 1920’s, publishing the findings of their labs on the ingredients of the cures and the possibilities of whether any of the hundreds (thousands?) of these things worked at all.
And what the AMA found was really pretty remarkable–lots of water, sugar, tartar,
tinctures of useless this and that, desicated liver, seaweed, salt, lemon, and that
sort of thing, none of which had any value for weight reduction whatsoever. A
major ingredient, for some reason, was focus vesiculosus, also known as
bladderwrack, sea-wrack, kelp-ware and sea-oak–there was no indication of why this
ingredient was so popular, especially since it was used in some farms as a pig feed
to make the animals fat.
So, aside from the pig-fattening ingredient for human “flesh reduction”, we’ll have a quick alphabetical tour of some of the outrageous (and bizarrely-named) products and their components promising hope and physical happiness to the woman of 1925. (Let’s note that the following are just locally-applied or ingested cures-there’s an entire universe of external applications and devices that were used to solve the problem of fat. For example, the Violet Ray Machine claimed that in addition to obesity it would cure “Problems with circulation of the blood, the heart’s action, bumps of the funny-bone, germ infections, weakness, the waste of the body, congestion, impaired physical development, pains and aches, complexion and skin diseases, facial and body blemishes, hair loss, headaches, inflammation of joints, muscles, nerves, Atrophy, circulatory disorders, constipation, deafness, goitre, high blood pressure, arteriosclerosis, insomnia (sleeplessness-Brain Fag), indigestion, dyspepsia, neuritis, nervousness, hysteria, melancholia, neurasthenia, neuralgia, obesity, pain, paralysis, prostate gland problems, scalp diseases, falling hair, dandruff, asthma, anemia, bronchitis, catarrh, hay fever, rose fever, colds and other inflammations of the upper air passages, and, of course, cancer.” This quote with thanks from the Museum of Quack Meidcal Therapy Devices
And so to the consumable and applied quack fat cures:
Absorbit Reducing Paste-one of my favorites. This was a nighttime sleeping paste
which was composed of 44% lard as well as beeswax, oil and milk. After slathering
yourself in this oily, waxy, milky fat cocoon (the sheets!) you were also supposed
to ingest an accompanying night aid pill, which was 24% sulphur and 61% sugar. So
not only would you be oily milky waxy lardy, you’d also be stinky and, at the end of
it all, hyper.Allmans Anti Fat Anti Pon (?)). According to its label, it was a “powerful and
entirely harmless specific”, which the AMA revealed to be composed of citric acid,
water and food coloring. Sounds like Kool Aid.Arbolone tablets. These guys were made of desiccated thyroid, starch, lime and sugar.
Basy Bread was a “anti growth” bread which turned out to be just a course wheat bread
Clark’s Thinning Salts was almost entirely washing soda.
Dalloff’s Time Pills were made of lavender and bearberry.
Elfin Fat reducing Gum Drops (continuing its spectacular name by saying it was a
product of the Pep-Giving Product Co., Inc.), was actually one of the only items
that might have contributed to weight loss, if only for the fact that in addition to
consuming its drops made of laxative and sugar you were supposed to adhere to a
pretty regimented, difficult exercise routine. Big sweat and potent laxative does
in fact produce weight loss. Maybe not a good weight loss, but aa weight loss
nevertheless.Elimiton (!) was a product made of caffeine and rhubarb.
Every Woman’s Flesh Reducer promised a new figure with their mixture of Epsom salt
and camphor.Fatsoff, a soap product that you washed with, was not surprisingly made of soap.
Fayro was another soap and washing flesh reduction “package” that asserted that by
using their secret flesh reducing salve (i.e., “soap”), you would “open your pores
to let the blood cells sweat off fat”. I could just about see the AMA guy who was
writing their description of this thing slamming his pen and screaming.Some other F’s included Fells Reducing Tablets (which were milk), Figurroids (salty
baking soda), Floradona (sodium thiosulphate, the photographer’s “hypo”), and Folt’s
Reducing Soap (which was, again, soap).Get Slim was a vile purgative of sugar, tartar and baking soda, plus perfumes.
Hall’s Tablet Triturates were ginger and a big shake of chalk; Hargreaves Reducing
Wafers (bread and liquorice).J.Z. Obesity tablets–were the same product as Absorbit which was the same as
Zobeide (minus the ox mucus).LaMar reducing Soap (“to wash away fat”) was soap.
Marmola, “a thyroid-containing obesity cure” was composed of cornstalk, borax, baking
soda and tartaric acid, with a special “constipation agent” (?), as well as a lot of
salt.Morlene would reduce goitersm neck fat, bust size and tumors, somehow, with the
application of its cleansing elements (soap).Neutroid seems to have been the most lethal of the hundreds tested, contaning bad
dollops of magnesium carbonate and iodol, and was taken internally (where external
application could prove fatal).Oil of Korein was pretty nasty stuff, containing sassafrass and about 75% petrolatum
(a semi-solid mixture of hydrocarbons, or petroleum jelly), though it also offered
some really good advice on foods to avoid if you didn’t want to actually gain
weight.Phy-thy-rin was a calcium and sugar coated pill of iodine and dried thyroid, with
plenty of sugar, and liquorice.Rusell’s Anti-Corpulent {reparation was a powdered added to water that would
effectively produce orange Kool-Aid.Sangra Bath Salts was perhaps the most outrageously simple, being just colored bath
salt. Slendaform (“just gently rub it in, and watch yourself get thin”), was a
half-pound jar of oil of turpentine, white vinegar and milk curd. Slyphine, which
crowded its ads with tremendous claims to be “Absolutely The Best Weight Reducer
Ever Discovered” and other very shouty claims (by somehow “attracting surplus
fat”), was simply borax and talc.Dr. Vincent’s Anti-Stout Pills contained a pretty sounding mixture of aloes, jalap,
cloves and bladderwrack.Mme. Yale’s Fertilizer Tablets-I’m not sure about the real use of “fertilizer”
here.) was actually one of the earliest of these frauds to be attacked by the
government, being charged with fraud by “misbranding” in 1909, as federal chemists
could find no connection between weight loss and its sole ingredients of sugar,
charcoal and cream of tartar.Lastly, we offer Zobeude, which was just Absorbit Reducing Paste relabled for
British consumption, though it seems to have contained an added ingredient of
“purified ox bile”. We are told in Bruce’s Materia Medica of 1884 that “Purified ox
bile has the composition of fresh bile, less the mucus .” -
Motion and Change in Natural Sculpture–The Galileos of Clouds and Snowflakes
JF Ptak Science Books Post 1692
(I wrote this post two years ago in the bookstore section of this blog but never put it in the blog. Here’s an addition to the Howard material in a new listing in the bookstore section.)
It is odd to think among the great classifiers of nature, including even the lofty-namer Aristotle, that clouds were not scientifically classified until the early 19th century. Here they are, just about the biggest thing we have as earthlings that are gigantic and close to us, and nobody offered a good classifications scheme until 200-odd years ago—a pretty slim margin of time in the terms of recorded human history.

Clouds are of course problematic, what with floating around and all—but if you didn’t already know the relative newness of their recognizable names isn’t it shocking to learn this bit of history? For the most part I think clouds must have been thought as being too transient, changeable, whimsical, wispy, to be given proper names. The great scientist and classifier Lamarck tried to do so in his Annuaire Méteorologique of 1802, and really is the first to try this, but his ideas weren’t terribly good (especially compared to the rest of his work), and it seems as though he left his best thinking effort on clouds at home. For example, he gave us Hazy, dappled, massed, broom-like and grouped clouds as classifications (in French, respectively, en forme de voile, pommelés, attroupés, en balayeurs and groupés). They seem quite “French” to me, but largely outside the scope of being useful.
It was the English pharmacist and chemist Luke Howard who in 1803 gave a greater bit of thought to structuring cloud names, classifying them according to size and shape and giving them Latin names—and this forms the basis of our naming clouds to this day. Howard was perhaps the first, greatest, meteorologist, producing On the Modification of Clouds, (in which he describes his naming system, the “modification” part actually meaning classifying rather than changing), The Climate of London, and the first textbook on weather, Seven Lectures on Meteorology. Howard’s system was expanded in 1887 by Abercromby and Hildebrandsson, who further classified clouds by height above ground as well as by appearance (and utilizing Howard’s naming system).
Here (below) are two fine, early examples of cloud-naming for the scientifically-minded of the British elite, finding their way into print in the fabulous, ingenious and mammoth (45-volume) Cyclopædia, or The New Cyclopaedia, or, Universal Dictionary of the Arts and Sciences, edited by Abraham Rees (1743-1825). The work was published between 1802 and 1820, and was the resulting effort of 100 contributors who generally wrote monograph-length entries, contributing to a final tally of close to 40 million words. I’ve particularly enjoyed the illustrations like those below—some of which have become iconic—and especially the fine and deep engraving of Wilson Lowry.
Howard began his system by identifying three basic shapes to clouds: heaps, layers, and curls. Heaps of separated cloud masses with flat bottoms and bulbous, splayed, tops, which he called cumulus, which is Latin for heap; the Latin stratus was applied to clouds in layers which were much wider than they were thick; and again to Latin for cirrus, which called out the wispy curls of clouds. (Rain clouds were given the Latin nimbus, for rain, and so on.) It is interesting and romantic to think of Howard being moved in his love of clouds as many Brits and Europeans were in the Volcanic Year of 1783 by the enormous eruptions of the Eldeyjar (Iceland) and Asama Yama (Japan) volcanoes—the force of their eruptions caused enormous changes in the skies (especially in Europe), creating vast sky-borne tapestries (the “Great Fogg” in England) and for such extended periods of time that it would have been impossible for the scientifically-minded Howard not to see them.

Similar, in a way, to clouds is the snow crystal (snowflake)—they change forms in their lives from sky to ground, and may well disappear on contact with a warm surface. Of course unlike clouds they may fall and be captured, kept even, though the ability to actually perform some sort of scientific something with them didn’t occur until 400 years ago, which means that snowflakes passed in and out of human existence being very simply named (in most languages) as a mass group, and not classified at all.

Johannes Kepler thought very deeply in In 1611 publishing a short treatise called On the Six-Cornered Snowflake, thinking that perhaps their (mistaken) six-cornered symmetry revealed something much deeper about the basis of nature and the universe. The 26-year-old Robert Hooke seems to be recognized as the first to throw the snowflake under a microscope, publishing drawings of them and just about everything else that he saw in his monumental (and tall, being 13-inches tall) Micrographia (1665)–the first truly scientific book of modern times. The largest of the large images was saved for the flea, showing the unsuspecting public the great and beautiful nature of what seemed like a fantastical beast (under magnification). Snowflakes appeared in the book, revealed in their intricate and seemingly-symmetrical nature. Fantastic, unimagined images. This aside, he seems to have, um, borrowed these images from an earlier work, Thomas Bartholin’s De Nivus usu Medico Observationes Varieae, 1661. But so it goes.
The Galileo of the snowflake was Wilson Bentley (1865-1931), an autodidact Vermont farmer, seen by fellow hamlet-dwellers as odd and off, who figured out how to photographically and beautifully record the intricacies of the snow crystal world—no one had ever done this so dramatically, with such gorgeous results. It really was as though he was able to record the heights of the mountains of the moon with a slender telescope in Pisa, 350 years earlier. The results of his decades of experience were published in 1931 his book Snow Crystals, containing more than 2400 snow crystal images. On the heals of Bentley’s accomplishments came the classically trained nuclear physicist Ukichiro Nakaya, who was truly the first person to apply a scientific classification to snowflakes, and who published his intrepidly-beautiful work in a 1954 book entitled Snow Crystals: Natural and Artificial. His classification system of the various types of snowflakes would prove vastly more useful, interesting and appealing than that published by the 1951 the International Commission on Snow and Ice, and forms the basis of the discussion of snow crystals today—a classification system of a massively-occurring phenomenon that is younger than me.
-
Propaganda: Germany and the U.S. Together in Dual New Deals (1935)
JF Ptak Science Books Post 1695
“That was mere foreplay; Where books are burned, human beings are destined to be burned too. ” (In German: “Das war Vorspiel nur. Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen.”)
– Heinrich Heine, Almansor (1821)This sickly pamphlet America and Germany Against the World Crisis, 1935), written by Carl M. Selle, is a comparison of the “American and German New Deal”, and their joint effort in fighting the great depression as one of the “overwhelming catastrophe(s) of the Great War” by the “new governments” of the United States and Germany. It is a ludicrous, damaging, offalous piece of Berlin-published propaganda aimed at winning soft hearts and minds in the U.S. and other English-speaking countries.
“In Germany Hitler so augmented relief measures that a new note of hope as heard in that country”. These measures included—according to Selle, the Winterhilfswerk* which he equated with Roosevelt’s NRA, and the Deutsche Gesellschaft fier Offenliche Agbeiten (Oeffa) with the PWA (Public Works Administration).
What Selle didn’t mention is the story here, and not the seeming correspondences between the economic policies of the two countries.
Principal in Selle’s Corrupt Memory Timeline (and this just dealing with the Nazis up until 1935) are the Nuremberg Race Laws, which were the principal step in outlawing the right of “human being” for a segment of the German human society. “The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor” (regarding Jewish marriage) and “The Reich Citizenship Law” (designating Jews as subjects) were the major components of these laws–there would be a dozen more which would classifying the Jewish people as subjects of the Reich and eventually, simply, disposable “things”.
On June 30, 1934, Hitler consolidated his power with The Night of the Long Knives, sealing his control of the Nazi army by ridding it of the “corrupt” influences of the SA, murdering the lice’s lice.
In May 1933 was the first great Nazi book burning, which was a continuation of a tradition that spread across the continents and back through the millennia (and that’s another story for another day), destroying the ideas held in physical form of the works of H.G. Wells, Jack London, Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, and other “non-patriotic” and “anti-German, anti-Aryan” “degenerate” works.* Book burning was the visual record of a much deeper destruction of the intellectual and cultural heritage of Germany, and was a very direct effort for thought and language control, autonomizing the creativity of an entire people (or at least those who were still considered to be “people”). It was also one of the early steps in eradicating ideas that were dangerous to a fragile and highly suspect intellectual foundation of a movement; that led inexorably to the destruction of the people who would have those ideas. It was also in this year that the Nazi Party was declared the only legitimate, political organization in Germany. So, when Hindenburg dies in 1934 and Hitler is made Fuhrer, it is not surprising that Hitler receives a 90% “yes” vote in the national referendum of August 19, 1934..
Earlier in the same year as the publication of this dirty little piece, January 26, 1935, was the passing of a law for forced abortions for people with hereditary diseases.
And on and on. The pamphlet was a meagre attempt to legitimize the cancerous growth of Nazism, equating it in whatever way possible with the efforts of the Roosevelt administration in order to give themselves some small washing of external friendly legitimacy. I don’t know anything about the author (though the name of the publisher related to a famous German American from the Civil War/Reconstruction period of U.S. history), but his efforts were soft, conservative, and embarrassing. And nothing new, or original.
But this sort of activity–hearts and minds campaigns–is still the coin of the realm of aspects of political /power relationship interactions.
-
Beauty in Shades of Gray of Stellar Spectra, 1863
JF Ptak Science Books Quick Post
This very quick posting is made in relation to a book just posted to the blog’s bookstore (Gustav Kirchhoff’s “Zur Geschichte der Spectral-Analyse under der Analyse der Sonnenatmosphaere”(On the history of spectral analysis and the analysis of the solar atmosphere)–or at least in relation to another object in the 1863 Annalen der Physik volume. And that other object is this, this beautiful series of diagrams illustrating “Ueber das Verhalten einiger Farbstoffe im Sonnenspectrum” by J. Haerlin, on elements in the spectrum of the Sun that appeared in teh same volume, tucked away at the end of the journal–art in science.
And this, a bit of detail into the grays:
·Posted by :
·in:
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Absurdist, Unintentional (1,452)
- Alphabets (136)
- American History: Western Exploration & Native Americans (120)
- Anticipation, History of (812)
- Architecture and Building (478)
- Art (108)
- Art History (684)
- Astronomy (324)
- Atlas of Dead Ideas (72)
- Atomic and Nuclear weapons (362)
- Aviation & flight (294)
- Bad Ideas (1,008)
- Beautiful books (62)
- Biology (24)
- Blank and Empty Things; A History of (726)
- Books–Great Cover Art (114)
- Books–title pages, beautiful (70)
- Books: Great & Lost in the Dust (24)
- Books: Title Pages, Unusual (30)
- Boredom, History of (22)
- Brevity and Complexity (102)
- Calculating (118)
- Chemistry (1)
- Chemistry, history of (32)
- Children's Art (46)
- Circles, Geometry (12)
- Color & its advanced Abuses (62)
- Color Theory (64)
- Computer Tech/History (258)
- Contraries (22)
- Cross-Sections (50)
- Daily Dose from Dr. Odd (168)
- Economics (16)
- Electro-LUXurious (42)
- Exploration (6)
- Fantastic Beasts and Tales (18)
- Fantastic Titles (90)
- Fear, History of (42)
- Future Punk (54)
- Future, History of the (624)
- German Design (28)
- Histories of Smallness (60)
- History (4)
- History of Dots (144)
- History of Goodbye (122)
- History of Holes (67)
- History of Lines (166)
- History of Memory (64)
- History of Nothing (94)
- History of the Future (690)
- How Fast Stuff Is. (6)
- Iconography (160)
- Imaginary and Impossible, Museum of the (28)
- Impossible Books (70)
- Industrial & Technological art (342)
- Information, Quantitative Display of (1,236)
- Inventions (132)
- Lines, History of (72)
- Literature (4)
- Magnifcent Mundane (28)
- Manuscripts (12)
- Maps, Cartography, History of Mapmaking (500)
- Maps/Diagrams of Imagination & Ideas (348)
- mathematics, logic (220)
- Medicine, History of (180)
- Memory, Historry of (24)
- Militaria (950)
- Mistakes, The Importance of (14)
- Music (24)
- Mythology (28)
- Naming Things (294)
- Outsider Logic (196)
- Patents (118)
- Perception (374)
- Perspective (398)
- Photography (290)
- Photography, history (138)
- Physics (117)
- Picture Post/Image Dump (10)
- Piles, History of (2)
- Politics, American (6)
- Poster Series (10)
- Prints–looking HARD/deeply at (558)
- Propaganda (110)
- Psychology (40)
- Quantum Theory (1)
- Questionable Quidity (52)
- Reference Tools (76)
- Science (14)
- Social History (293)
- Sports (10)
- Statistics–Fossil, Found, Odd, Forgotten (58)
- Strange Things in the Sky (82)
- Tech-Quiz (30)
- Technology, History of (835)
- Title Page Art, Beautiful (64)
- Travel (6)
- Uncategorized (309)
- What is It? (28)
- Women, History of (196)
- WORD art (30)
- World War I (496)
- World War II (55)
- Writing Systems (16)
- You Are There (12)
- Zoomology (50)












