A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

Author: JF Ptak

  • God’s Atomic Bomb: the Divine, the Infinite, and its “Gift” of the Bomb, 1946

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 234

    Blogsept_2_atomic_bomb_god481

    I’d like to say that this was a class-of-its-own sort of work, but as it  goes this is hardly the case.  If I cared a little I guess I could establish a collecting sub-category in the nuclear fission–atomic–nuclear weapon collection for the popular belief that god ordained and transmitted the atomic bomb.  There are at least five other pamphlets like this floating around in the store, and I am certain that there must’ve been dozens of other grabby little publications like this proclaiming Almighty Influence in the creation of the atomic bomb.  I can understand the reasoning behind the power grab:  the bomb ended the war a week after its second use, sparing the lives, perhaps, of a million soldiers (American and Japanese) and years of societal/infrastructure rehabilitation by eliminating the need of an American invasion of the Empire.  So the denominator was simply the “saved (American) lives” part. 

    Blogsept_2_atomic_bomb_god_2482

    Again, I can understand how this felt in 1945/6, but I still feel that getting the suspected creator of the universe involved in the making and use of the bomb was ill-advised.  The author of the first pamphlet reached back into history and credited god with simple solutions to complex situations:  employing the more modern political technique of controlling language in the Tower of Babel case (wher he also said that since Babel was only 105 years after the flood that Noah was still alive, and that certainly Noah “would’ve voted ‘No’” for the building of the tower); and using “Johnny Snowflake” to stop the “non-satanic” Napoleon from reaching “Britain’s doorstep (and obviousy not the Soviet Reds).  Bennet also  credits god with giving “Dr. Currie” (sic) the genius to “split atoms” in 1896. 

    The second pamphlet uses the atomic weapon a little more figuratively.  The author, Mel Morris, published this in 1945, which means he must’ve worked a little feverishly to pump up his bible prophesy and history to include the new atomic weapon to replace whatever else he had been using as a prophecy for end of times.  (As it turns out, “God’s Atomic Bomb” was more tempest and disaster in the bible, and not (whew!) the bomb itself.  Though as we’ve learned from scientologists and the sort-of creative mind of Ron Hubbard, a civilization came to the earth thousands of years ago and pummeled it with “atomic bombs” and other nastiness, polluting humans for milennia to come.  But that’s another story–suffice to say that Morris found many dozens of examples of “God’s Atomic Bomb” being used in the deep biblical past, and that the use of the real atomic bomb in 1945 was pre-ordained, and not without its figurative historical counterparts.  I’m not sure why any of this was necessary outside of proving to some small minority that these preachers could at least be contemporary and topical. 

    Blogsept_2_atomic_bomb_god_2txt483

     


  • Chicago Jails Reality Check, 1947

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 231

    Chicago Lockup

    The appearance and tenor of this pamphlet is very deceptive–my initial reaction was an eyebrow-raising surprise, followed by a humorous deception, all aroused by the incredible, screaming cover design and the somewhat bizarre stories and headlines in the text.  How can one refuse an article like this (seen below)? The “funny” part of the pamphlet was stopped dead cold when I started to actually read  the  stories accompanying  the  sub-title malaprops.

    Blogaugust_20_chciago_jails_clip4_2

    The point underlying all of these design elements which seem so much sugar to my eyes was that the prisons in Chicago were horrific–especially for African Americans, a point which is not explicitly made but alluded to.  None of this seemed particularly surprising to me, except that there were just so many reports–the shear numbers of bad prison conditions was just staggering. 

     

    Blogaugust_20chciago_jails_photo420

     


  • The Polish “Threat” to Germany, 1939: Nazi Propaganda on the Perceived Polish “Invasion”

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 230

    Blogsept_1_poland476

    In memory of the German attack upon Poland on 1 September 1939 I’d like to share this stupendously-titled pamphlet. This is one of those times when a pamphlet has posed an idea that had never before occurred to me. This anonymous work produced by the German propaganda machine in May 1939 presents the incredible assertion that Poland did indeed have plans to continue to break the back of Germany over the pretty-much-forgotten Treaty of Versailles, and to also physically attack south-eastern Germany sometime in 1940.

    Again, the idea that Germany was defending itself against an imminent attack by Poland was completely novel to me.  There’s always a reason for these sorts of beginnings of wars (Gulf of Tonkin, WMD), but this one really is exceptionally removed.  Poland had just decided to defend its borders against the Germans following their conquest of Czechoslovakia the previous year–until then the Polish military’s biggest threat was the Soviet Union.  The German attack, the blitzkrieg (Fall Weiss) which would begin on 1 September 1939 involved 1.5 million German soldiers attacking two principal points in Poland. It was ostensibly launched in response to a suppoed “Polish” attack on the German border town of Gliwce–an attack orchestrated and simulated by Germany.   In the attack, the Germans unleashed 11 tank divisions versus Poland’s 1; sent in 1250 bombers and fighters to Poland’s (mainly obsolete) 360; rolled 4 motorized divisions against Poland’s, um, hat’s right, they didn’t have any.  And of course the Germans had a modern and vastly superior navy, compared with Poland’s 4 destroyers, five subs, and assorted smaller numbers of smaller and less-significant vessels. 

    The British and the French issued an ultimatum to Germany to cease and desist; Hitler had no intentions in stopping, throwing the five armies of von Rundstedt and von Block deeper into the country in a fast and (according to many German generals) breakneck manner.  The British and French declared war on the 3rd, by which time the war in eastern Poland was already almost over.  The Germans did respond to the ultimatum (see this in continued reading, below) in which it outlines some of their needs and Polish-inspired dears. 

    By 24 September the Germans had reached the formerly important geographic boundary of the Vistula and swarmed past.  Warsaw was bombed by some 1150 aircraft, and by the 27th, the fighting was almost entirely over. (Some divisions held out to 6 October, the invasion completed in 36 days). 

    It is sometimes forgotten in the quickness of this defeat that Poland inflicted some heavy losses on the German military machine:  8000 soldiers killed with 27,000 wounded and 5,000 MIA; 217 tanks were destroyed.  The Luftwaffe lost over 500 planes, either entirely destroyed or damaged to the point of uselessness.  Polish losses were greater.

    It was at this time that the first of my grandmother’s brothers, Raymond Dymek of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, would cross the border into Canada and volunteer, becoming a pilot in the Royal Canadian Air Force.  He would fly against the Nazis with the CRAF, then joined the RAF, until finally, when the U.S. joined the  European war 27 months later, would fly for the U.S. Army Air Force.  He had a very long career and made it through.  His five brothers would also enlist in the U.S. armed forces; all six brothers would return home. Fatherland and all that.   I know the vocabuarly for their response to the idea that Germany was responding to a Polish threat of invasion didn’t exist to them–it barely does for me. 

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Empty and Missing Things 9: the Skeleton of the Statue of Liberty

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 217

    In the continuing thread of Empty and Blank and Missing People we find perhaps the largest and heaviest of all Blank People–the superstructure of the Statue of Liberty.  This woodcut appeared in the 13 June 1885 issue of The Scientific American, and shows the empty nest for Auguste Bartholdi’s “Liberty Enlightening the World”.  For an empty thing it weighed quite a lot, over 400,000 pounds of iron plate and the awaited repousse copper skin.  It was the tallest free-standing statue in history, but since (and only recently) has been eclipsed (see below for a short list of the tallest modern statues). 

    Blogaugust_25_missing_people_libert


  • Longest Rivers in the World–the top 95 in miles

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 216
    Africanqueen3

    Well, all I needed was a list of the lengths of 50 or so of the major rivers int he world, and I just couldn’t come up with one easily, so I threw this together this very simple list of the top 95 rivers by length.  The ironic point here is that I own quite a number of antiquarian maps which beautifully display this data–I just couldn’t find the data in a digital/manipulable form. It would be nice to have the areas drained by each and some other factors, but this is all I needed for the map store, and so I’ll share it here.  There are two lists below, the first listing the rivers by length and the second listing them alphabetically. 


    By Length (River Name, Continent, Length in Miles)

    Nile Africa 4132       
    Amazon South America 3900      
    Yangtze Asia 3430      
    Hwang Ho Asia 2093      
    Congo Africa 2900      
    Amur Asia 2802      
    Lena Asia 2653      
    Mackenzie North America 2635      
    Mekong Asia 2600      
    Niger Africa 2590       Fitzcarraldo

    Yenisey Asia 2565      
    Missouri North America 2466      
    Parana South America 2450      
    Mississippi North America 2330      
    Irtish Asia 2300      
    La Plata Paraguay South America 2300      
    Volga Europe 2293      
    Ob Asia 2260      
    Madeira South America 2060      
    Indus Asia 1980      
    Purus South America 1900      
    St. Lawrence North America 1900      
    Rio Grande North America 1885      
    Brahmaputra Asia 1800      
    Orinoco South America 1800      
    Sao Francisco South America 1800      
    Yukon North America 1800      
    Danube Europe 1770      
    Darling Australia 1750      
    Salween Asia 1730      
    Euphrates Asia 1675      
    Syr Darya Asia 1653      
    Zambezi Africa
    Tocantins South America 1640      
    Araguaia South America 1630      
    Amu Darya Asia 1628      
    Kolyma Asia 1615      
    Murray Australia 1600      
    Angara Asia 1550      
    Ganges Asia 1550      
    Pilcomayo South America 1550      
    Ural Asia 1522      
    Vilyuy Asia 1513      
    Arkansas North America 1450      
    Colorado North America 1450      
    Irrawaddy Asia 1425      
    Dnieper Europe 1420      
    Aldan Asia 1392      
    Negro South America 1305      
    Paraguay South America 1290      
    Kama Europe 1261      
    Xingu South America 1230      
    Don Europe 1224       The_bridge_on_the_river_kwai_dvd__l

    Ucayali South America 1220      
    Columbia North America 1214      
    Saskatchewan North America 1205      
    Jurua South America 1200      
    Peace North America 1195      
    Orange Africa 1155      
    Tigris Asia 1150      
    Pechora Europe 1118      
    Dvina Europe 1100      
    Tobol Asia 1093      
    Snake North America 1038      
    Uruguay South America 1025      
    Red North America 1018      
    Churchill North America 1000      
    Maranon South America 1000      
    Ohio North America 981      
    Magdelna South America 950      
    Roosevelt South America 950      
    Godavari Asia 930      
    Si Asia 930      
    Oka Europe 920      
    Canadian North America 906      
    Dnestr Europe 876      
    Brazos North America 870      
    Salado South America 870      
    Fraser North America 850      
    Parnaiba South America 850      
    Colorado North America 840      
    Rhine Europe 820      
    Narbada Asia 800      
    Athabasca North America 765      
    Donets Europe 735      
    Pecos North America 735      
    Green North America 730      
    Elbe Europe 720      
    James North America 710      
    Ottawa North America 696       Drums_across_river

    White North America 690      
    Cumberland North America 687      
    Gambia Africa 680      
    Yellowstone North America 671      
    Tennessee North America 652 


  • How to use the Atomic Bomb: Revisitng the Chicago Metal Lab Poll, 1945–Results of 2000+ responses

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 215

    HOW TO USE THE BOMB Poll, 1945–Results

    The results so far (August 23, 2008) from our Post re-offering the Chicago Metallurgical Lab’s poll of July 1945 shows the results from 1945 and 2008 to be quite similar.  Check the results for this day HERE.

    Overall the results are fairly similar—of course there were no controls in the 2008 poll, and it was taken by more than just the scientists at Chicago who helped build the bomb in 1945, and of course people were asked to try and place themselves with some judiciousness back into 1945.  So the results are necessarily problematic.  Even so, I’m not sure right now how to interpret them.

    The result with the greatest difference between 1945 and now was option#1—drop the bomb, drop it now, and drop it on a military target.  There were almost twice the percentage of people in ’08 who chose this than in 1945.  I’m not sure if I’m surprised by this or not—people today certainly know and probably could not put out f their mind that the Japanese didn’t surrender until days after the dropping of the Nagasaki bomb.  Wouldn’t this mean that more people would think to drop it?

    The second option, which frankly I thought would be the overwhelming choice in ’08 (the demonstration of the effectiveness of the bomb), increased somewhat by 25% to 46%.  I was thinking that this number would increase to 75%.  I would guess, though, that if the general public was given this poll (somehow) in 1945, that the overwhelming response would be option #1. After all there were millions of Americans in uniform and the threat of the invasion of Japan was tremendous.  My suspicion is that this number would be gigantic, 90% or something like that, because by this point the country was swimming in reports of terror and blood and death, and that the chance of ending it all in one or two steps would have been almost completely irresistible   remember:  no major decision-maker in the U.S. government had any reservations about the military use of the bomb.  There were private reservations on the use of the bomb among America’s top military men (Eisenhower, for one), but these men would not make the ultimate decision.
    This is a curious result that I need to think about some more.

    The results as of 23 August 2008:

    2008 poll takers=  2082 people.
    1945 poll takers=    150 people

    1. Use them in the manner that is from the military point of view most effective in bringing about prompt Japanese surrender at minimum human cost to our armed forces:  26%   (1945=15%)

    2. Give a military demonstration in Japan to be followed by renewed opportunity for surrender before full use of the weapon is employed  .  37%  (1945=46%)

    3. Give an experimental demonstration in this country, with representatives of Japan present; followed by a new opportunity for surrender before full use of the weapon is employed.  23%  (1945=26%)

    4. Withhold military use of the weapons, but make public experimental demonstration of their effectiveness. 10%  (1945=11%)

    5. Maintain as secret as possible all developments of our new weapons and refrain from using them in this war.  5%  (1945=2%)

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Outsider Logic: Breathtakingly Impossible Plan for Reorganizing Life in the U.S, 1936.

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 212
    Blogaugust_23_impossible_books_plum

    This pamphlet comes from our extensive Naïve Surreal collection, which is composed of (a) pamphlets that were concerned with commonplace ephemera in the past that today looks implausible or impossible, and (b) pamphlets that addressed issues of, shall we, a mostly-internal, very personal, High Imagination that may or may not have been part of the visual world.   

    This pamphlet, written in 1936 by Arthur Russell Groves, calls for nothing short of the reorganization of the social structure of the United States via systematic adherence to the “Coming Sun Plumbline Standard Hone via the National Constitution”–an idea which came in several parts to Mr. Groves through dreams.  The philosophy of the Sun Plumbline etc. is so spectacularly odd that it nearly defies description.  (For example, “sun plumbline” is “the absolute perfection of the Standard Home Measure  Sunspascc (not misspelled) Trip”, where “Sunspascc” was “the second name of the Tentative Standard Home Amendment, a two-fold meaning of unquestionable perfection and of the journey of life in perpetual sunlight, and consists of the first letter of the following eight words—standard, universal, normal, perpetual, abundant, self-supporting, cooperating, and creating…”  Oh dear.

    Blogaugust_23_impossible_books_pl_2

    As irresistible as this document seems, its unconnectedness is just far too demanding to allow understanding.  One good measure of this:  it defies memorization.  The pieces and bits that form this work are so logically fractured that quoting from memory would be exceptionally difficult, or hopefully so. 

    Another interesting bit about this pamphlet is that no matter where you may lose your place when reading it (and which happens often as your eyes easily slide off of the page) you have no idea of where you are, and you can pick up the reading anywhere at all.  It is a perfect example of a very interesting sub-set of books:  books whose words disappear while being read.  You can also read it backwards with little observable difference. 

    Mr. Groves was definitely, deeply engrossed in this philosophy–my guess is that he was pretty well consumed by it.  In his defense I’ve got to point out that he lovingly dedicated his work to his daughters.  He undoubtedly had little doubt in his own doubtful visions (one of which was about the letter “S”), and was certainly proud enough and sure enough to honor his daughters with the publication of his work.  So, as far out and as deeply removed as his ideas were, the bottom  line was that he was still someone’s daddy.
    Blogaugust_23_impossible_books_pl_3

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Classic in the History of Surgery (1833) and its Reviewer Who Hated Surgical Tools

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 211

    Blogaugust_22_blasiusdet425

    The medical doctor and 19th century hero of modern plastic surgery, Dr. Ernst Blasius, published a remarkable work in 1833. Ajnurgische Abbildungen oder Darstettung der Blutlgen Chirurgischen Operationem, u. a. w. Akiurgicol Figures, (or Representations of the Bloody Surgical Operations, and the Instruments devised for their performance, with Illustrative Text.) was a careful, historically grounded, masterful textbook, illustrated with 50 engravings of procedures and—perhaps most famously—surgical instruments. It is considered a foundation work of the 19th century, especially in regarding to procedures to the eye, and especially for the development of modern plastic and reconstructive surgery.
    Blogaugust_22_blasius424

    As important as this book was, it received a very singular, peculiar and anonymous  review in the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Exhibiting a Concise View of the Latest and Most important Discoveries in Medicine, Surgery, and Pharmacy (1836, volume 44, pp 539-544).  The reviewer (somehow, in ways that I cannot know or understand) found the illustrations of the instruments to be an abomination.

    Recounting that the surgeon’s “art” is a simple response to the inability to actually cure something with medical treatment—the reviewer states that the surgeon simply cuts things out.   He then makes a statement that I think is unique to my experience, saying that the gorgeous and painstaking illustrations of surgical instruments were calculated to repel the student “with an appearance both formidable and something repulsive.”  He continues: “If, however, this publication, by exhibiting instrumental surgery in its most complicated, formidable, and repulsive character, may damp the ardour of the surgical aspirant, it is also, by presenting all the various forms with which instruments have been endowed, useful in showing the surgeon the very height of the evil which he has to encounter. By placing before him such numbers and varieties of instruments, it may enable him to choose that which, upon mature consideration, seems best calculated for the proposed purpose.”   The unnamed reviewer does acknowledge the great understanding and historical grounding and command of deep literature, as well as the surgical techniques that Balsius presents in the book, and even goes so far as to describe them as “unrivaled”.  But he keeps returning to the illustrations, and particularly the images of the instruments, which he just simply cannot tolerate.  He ends the review saying that it would be a huge benefit to republish and translate the Balsius in English, and, given that opportunity, a great many of the instrument illustrations should be left out. “The explanatory descriptions, by which these illustrations are accompanied, show extensive and accurate knowledge of the literary history of operative surgery. All the operative methods and their peculiarities are carefully explained; and whoever studies this work cannot fail to understand thoroughly the merit of the different methods proposed for accomplishing each operation. This leads us to think that a republication in this country,! with a translation of the explanatory details, would be extremely useful ; and, in such circumstances, the number and variety of the instruments represented might be greatly diminished, while the anatomical figures and the views of operative processes might be retained.”

    The hatred of the surgical tools images is almost incoherent—especially since they were of such high importance, and that the book was being reviewed by a doctor for doctors and in a medical journal

    .

     


  • The Order of Life: 144 images showing the progression and systematization of life, 1849

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 210

    Blogaugust_21_order_of_life_detai_2

    This engraving (s small section of which is highlight from the full image below), plate I/74/B.7 (yes, an incredible but true plate number)  from Johann Georg Heck’s masterpiece, Iconographic Encyclopedia, (American edition), 1849-1852, is a 12×12 grid basically showing the progression of the orders of earthly life.  It is a result years of zoological thinking, a systemic exposition of animals created by Aristotle, Pliny, Galen, Belon, Rendeletius, Gesner, Aldrovandi, Mouffer, Linneaus, Cuvier and etc.  Most were scientists  though many repeated the fables and imagined observations of earlier, less scientifically-fortunate colleagues (like Pliny, whose fantastical assertions took root over 15 centuries).
    Blogaugust_21_order_of_life421

    This fine and minutely-detailed work packs an incredible amount of data on a sheet of paper just 8×10 inches big (or small), 145 (don’t forget Eve in the 12-square grid!) elegantly arranged and easily identified images in 80 square inches.  It is a beautiful and remarkable accomplishment, and Heck’s artists did 435 times throughout the length of the work. (I wrote a post about Heck’s illustrations of the construction of the Thames Tunnel back in June.)

    Life is arranged—here in 1849—along four division and 18 classes, from Radiata to Mollusca to Articulata to Vertebrata (ending with Adam and Eve, even though the couple is simply classified as Homo in the text, standing virtually next to Simis).  It is a classic (or should be) of scientific illustration, the net effect of which is similar to a flip book or nickelodeon–the images seem to just roll past and through the brain.   

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Unusual Maps: Cartographic Displays of Comparative Distance–Supplying Great Britain in 1940

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 209

    Blogaugust_21_ww2_map_odd423 This map comes to us from The Illustrated London News, 3 August 1940, which reproduced it from an article in Fortune Magazine.  Though it looks oddly wrong from the outset, it really is pretty lucid–elegant, even–once you understand its purpose.  And the purpose of this map was to show the distances that the goods and raw materials from the British Empire (and from the possessions of France) had to travel via the then-closed Suez Canal route versus the new routes “not open to enemy interference” to Great Britain.  Countries depicted in outline show the distance via Suez while the same country depicted in shade show the new, longer, non-Suez route.  Ever stiff lipped, the Brits announced that even though some of their major natural resources are coming from these vastly removed areas, “even with the fall of France, the British Empire and its allies remain an economically self-contained and immensely powerful war unit, and still control the great part of the world production of some vital commodities…” I’m not sure why, exactly, that it was necessary to display this map to the public eye, what with England under assault in the Battle of Britain (the Nazis extending their aerial assault in preparation for Operation Sealion), the loss of France, and the nearly-there Nazi blockade of English waters.  Perhaps it was drawn to show that even though the material was coming from the same places that were now further away, they were still getting there.