A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

Category: Computer Tech/History

  • The Family Tree of Computer Development, Part II

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    I’ve found a supplement to an earlier computer tree that I published on this blog (here) as a part of a chronological list of (nearly every) computer manufactured from 1943 to 1990.  The new one is interesting and has its differences from its predecessor, and divides its generations of computers in terms of logic technology. It is found in a 1960 NSF pamphlet called “The Family Tree of Computer Design”, a Brief Summary of Computer Development, and I found its reference in a good book by I.B. Cohen, Howard Aiken, Portrait of a Computer Pioneer, published by MIT and available here.

    [Image source: Microsoft.]

    The earlier “Computer Tree”, from Electronic Computers Within the Ordnance Corps , by Karl Kempf. “U.S. Army Diagram”, the source of this information coming from the U.S. Army, here.

    This image is expandable.

    Computer tree

    More detailed images of the computer tree are found below:


  • Alan Turing–Report Card Teachers’ Comments, 1926-1931

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 1770

    Turing

    Image source:  www.thegalleryofheroes.com

    There is a terrific find on Alex Bellos’ website exhibiting Alan Turing’s “report cards” for his time at the great Sherborne School from 1926-1930 (and which were transcribed by archivist Rachel Hassall), from the time when Turing was 14 to 19 years old. Turing (1912-1954) I think needs no introduction for his importance to mathematics and computing (and code breaking during WWII), and it is very interesting—thrilling even—to see how his instructors were coming to grips with the developing genius. Even at such a school as Sherborne (a very old school with 39 headmasters overseeing the place since 1437) where the teachers were I am sure familiar with gifted pupils, The comments on the reports of Turing’s progressed showed that many weren’t quite sure about what Turing was all about. Obviously Turing as a boy was very gifted, but many instructors reported as many hindrances to his intellectual development as there were advances—more, even.

    Perhaps people at the school didn’t know exactly how to deal with him; perhaps they did, but still at the end of the day Turing had to meet the common standards of the school. Or perhaps not—I really can’t tell from the transcripts presented by Bellos and I don’t know the intricate history of the school. But certainly as time progressed Turing’s abilities were more readily recognized, but early on it seems that his talents didn’t overwhelm his many supposed shortcomings, the faults of the parts larger than the whole of what he could accomplish. In instructors’ comments across all of his disciplines, Turing was “capricious”, “untidy”, “lacking in life”, “need(ed) concentration”, “depressing unless it amuses him”, “careless”, “absent minded”, “un-methodological”, “slovenly”, (made) “mistakes as a result of hastywork”, and so on. He “could do much better” though one instructor felt that “he may fail through carelessness”. All of which may well have been true—from the outside. These statements may have simply been the result of teachers not being able to reach a boy genius, and perhaps the boy couldn’t be reached, at least early on in his academic career.

    The statements in general—especially in the maths—I think are fascinating things. It may be easy to judge some of the remarks as intemperate, the teachers unable to clearly see the genius-in-the-making who (70 years later) we can so clearly see today. I think the remarks need more careful consideration than that, and that is where they become interesting.

    Here are some selection from reports on Alan Turing, 1926-1930, below; a more full list exists at the Bellos site, here.

    Subject: Mathematics

    1926. Works well.  He is still very untidy.  He must try to improve in this respect

    1927. Very good.  He has considerable powers of reasoning and should do well if he can quicken up a little and improve his style.

    ____. A very good term’s work, but his style is dreadful and his paper always dirty.

    ____. Not very good.  He spends a good deal of time apparently in investigations in advanced mathematics to the neglect of his elementary work.  A sound ground work is essential in any subject.  His work is dirty.

    ____. Despite absence he has done a really remarkable examination (1st paper).  A mathematician I think.

    ____ I think he has been somewhat tidier, though there is still plenty of room for improvement.  A keen & able mathematician.

     


  • On the Early Development of ASCII

    The History of ASCII.  I just wanted to include this short bit on a small archive of material related to the development of ASCII from one of the team members who helped to create it.  A more full description appears in the “continue reading” section, below. [Since writing this in 2012 the archive has been donated to special collections at North Carolina State University at Raleigh, where I assume it can be viewed and utilized.]

    Mullendore651

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • The Computer (mostly Ads) on TV, 1955-1986

    JF Ptak Science Books, Quick Post

    Here’s a selection of nine early television spots for computers and computing…and calculating.  The piece on the coming Internet (1969) to me is the most interesting:

    Mid-1950’s and how engineers build computers:


  • A New Miniature, TV-size Computer: the Leprechaun, 1957

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

    “Leprechaun, an Automatic Digital Computer the Size of a Television Set”  was a short article written for Computers and Automation in the July 1957 issue.  It is uncredited, by the two-pager I think was the product of the editor, Edmund Berkeley, and discussed a remarkable new computer that was as “small” as a not-by-today’s-standards small television set.  The Leprechaun used seriously fewer components than a “regular” machine (though that standard is not identified), using “only about 9,000 electrical components”, half of which were transistors).

    Leprechaun represents a significant advance in computer design, with its innards very reachable and accessible, making it a highly useful tool for testing other components for other machines. The TRADIC (for TRAnsistor DIgital Computer or TRansistorized Airborne DIgital Computer) was also the first transistorized computer in America, completed in 1954, and the godchild of  J. H. Felker of Bell Labs for the for the U.S. Air Force, and was initially designed for use aboard an aircraft or a naval vessel (making it the first airborne transistorized digital computer). The idea of the manageably-sized computer had only recently lifted itself from science fiction thoughts of it being able to fit in the trunk of a car (as envisioned somewhat earlier by Isaac Asimov) and here we see it, already in the future-made-present, miniaturized to the size of a television set.

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Battlebots of the First Mobile Computers: 20 Tons of Fun

    JF Ptak Science  Books      Post 1741

    Well, perhaps not “fun”, unless that was an acronym for “fabulously understated nomenclature”.   The first mobile computers–as science fiction-y

    The Mobile Digital Computer was intended to be a transistorized van-mounted computer used to store and route data as part of the U.S. Army’s Fieldata system.  The machine was indeed built and deployed by 1959–as were the MOBIDIC A,B,C,D,E and 7a by the early 1960’s–and it was a successful component, even though the overall network was not successful.  Fieldata was supposed to integrate all manner of information and distribute it to battlefield recipients. My friend (Dr.)  Carl Hammer (1914-1904), who I knew from being in the neighborhood in Georgetown, was a delightful man who had long and significant history in the development of the modern computer.  He told me one afternoon–stopping in to visit on his constitutional–in his sly and amusing way about working on the MOBIDIC while he was at Sylvania. (He had just finished heading up Remington Rand’s UNIVAC European Division before going to Sylvania.) Anyway he started his story about the MOBIDIC by telling me that it was the world’s first portable computer (sitting in a 42-foot-long semitrailer) and that it had gun racks.  The reason for the gun racks was simple–if something was made by the U.S. Army, and it had wheels, then it had to have a gun rack.  Case closed.

    Now, to the contender, the “other” first mobile computer, the DYSEAC on its computer trailer.   Most of what I have read places the MOBIDIC with priority, but others clearly place the machine in operation in 1954, years before the MOBIDIC became operational.  In any event the DYSEAC was the Second Standards Electronic Automatic Computer, a first generation National Bureau of Standards computer built for the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Here’s the cross-section cutaway for it:

    Dyseac334

    And so on to the battle between the two, outfitting them perhaps with crunching and sawing devices, metal biting bits, and so on, I wonder which might be the one to come out on top?  I think I’d like to claim the MOBIDIC, if for no other reason than it was armed.  And the name, of course.

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • A Note on the Vast Wealth Possibilities of the Refill Business: Ink and Paper

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 1735

    http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/reg-card-80.gif

    [Source: Columbia University computing history site, here.]

    I guess that the only reason why HP charges for their printers is that they can.  When you buy one of these products you’re basically purchasing the need to keep the things fed with semi-proprietary HP ink–and as everyone knows, printers are notoriously thirsty creatures, and one can easily spend multiples of the cost of the printer on ink in the first year alone. 

    This is a great idea so far as the manufacturer goes, but it is hardly a new one–International Business Machines counted on this sort of income for several decades, partially getting the company through the Great Depression. 

    And what was the IBM necessary-suppliable that their customers had to keep buying over and over?  It was the business machines themselves, because it was IBM practice to rent their machines out (which would pay for the initial investment and production in the machine in about two years, and most customers seemed to keep their rented mater1al for 5 or 7 or 10 years.  What IBM kept supplying their customers with was the stuff that they sent through the machines–the IBM cards.  The customer needed the cards from IBM itself, mainly because it was part of the contractual agreement for the lease of the machine, and also because the IBM product was superior to other mass-produced cards.  In the 1930’s the card business for IBM accounted to something like a few billion cards per year, which evidently would account for 30-40% of IBM’s yearly profit.  And that’s quite something. 

    The idea of the necessary refill is not IBM’s to claim for themselves–years earlier, Eastman Kodak accomplished the same deal with film for their cameras; and razor blades were supplied by Gillette to users of their razors.  And although you don’t need Ford gasoline to run a Ford automobile, in the 1930’s you did need a General-Motors spark plug to run a G-M vehicle.  Radio Corporation of America sold radios and also the necessary tubes to replace the ones in the stock radio; Thomas Edison too had a vastly controlling interest on how his light bulbs would be installed and replaced. 

    So as annoying as it might be to have to pay a fair amount of money for a small amount of ink to make your printer function, the printer-producing companies are just following an old (and highly profitable) business practice. 


  • An Early English-Language Image Diplay from a Computer, 1957

    JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

    Computer display225
    The cover of this magazine–Computers and Automation, one of the earliest popularly-based journals dealing with electronic computation–features a rather remarkable image, an English message, a response to a problem, from a computer.  The editor, Edmund C. Berkeley, wrote a short appreciation of this “output device for an automatic computer”, a “symbol generator and viewer”. 

    “The screen of the picture tube shown will present as many as 10,000 characters per second. Each character is formed by an array of bright spots, a selection from a rectangular array of a total of 35 spots, five wide and seven deep.  For a capital letter T, for example, the selection is five spots across the top and six more spots down through the middle…

    For 1957, it would have been a remarkable thing to see messages displayed in such a fashion, in a revolutionary new way.

    Computer display225


  • A Pictorial Manual on Computers, 1957

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

    Computer look like 9224

    This lovely illustrated story appears in the December 1957 issue of Edmund Berkeley’s Computers and Automation, which was the world’s first semi-popular magazine devoted to the computer.  The article is divided into questioned sections, including:

     “What is ‘Operating a Computer’ Like?,  showing the “new Computing Center” at the famous Moore School of Electrical Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania, the place where most of modern computing in America was born in 1944/5/6. 

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • A History of Holes: Electric “Holes”

    JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post   [Part of a series on the History of Holes.]

    Well, this really isn’t a “hole” per se, but it, the “hole”, certainly behaves like one, at least metaphorically.  The concept occurs in the title of this famous work by the problematic William Shockley (below)–it was the bible, really, of all early things relating to the semiconductor–the electron hole being the mathematical opposite of an electron  (e– ).  (The electron is a subatomic particle with a negative charge, explained very early on in its first format as “radiant energy” by William Crookes in 1879, who built on the earlier work of Hittorf and then on Goldstein, with the name “electron” finally coming to the particle by George F. Fitzgerald.)

    Shockley208The “hole” is a metaphor, a useful use of a word to explain the absence of an electron from a full outer shell.  In a semiconductor, an electric current is carried not only by the flow of electrons but also by the flow of positively charged holes where the electron absence occurs–the hole is an electronic absence charge carrier, and it the basis for modern electronics.

    [This book may be purchased by the person who cannot live without it on our blog bookstore site.]