A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

Category: Militaria

  • Unusual Maps: Cartographic Displays of Comparative Distance–Supplying Great Britain in 1940

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC  Post 209

    Blogaugust_21_ww2_map_odd423 This map comes to us from The Illustrated London News, 3 August 1940, which reproduced it from an article in Fortune Magazine.  Though it looks oddly wrong from the outset, it really is pretty lucid–elegant, even–once you understand its purpose.  And the purpose of this map was to show the distances that the goods and raw materials from the British Empire (and from the possessions of France) had to travel via the then-closed Suez Canal route versus the new routes “not open to enemy interference” to Great Britain.  Countries depicted in outline show the distance via Suez while the same country depicted in shade show the new, longer, non-Suez route.  Ever stiff lipped, the Brits announced that even though some of their major natural resources are coming from these vastly removed areas, “even with the fall of France, the British Empire and its allies remain an economically self-contained and immensely powerful war unit, and still control the great part of the world production of some vital commodities…” I’m not sure why, exactly, that it was necessary to display this map to the public eye, what with England under assault in the Battle of Britain (the Nazis extending their aerial assault in preparation for Operation Sealion), the loss of France, and the nearly-there Nazi blockade of English waters.  Perhaps it was drawn to show that even though the material was coming from the same places that were now further away, they were still getting there. 


  • Propaganda Maps #2: the Nazis. the Big Lie, and Cartography

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 202
    Propaganda_map_czech
    In a quick follow-up to my propaganda post of 4 August I’d like to add a couple of images and also distinguish propaganda maps from anthropomorphic/humorous maps.  Both of the former are Nazi-generated and depict the threat posed by the rest of the world to the German nation.  Somehow, even in 1934, when the first map was published, the German propaganda machine evoked the Big Lie in this depiction of Czechoslovakia’s aerial threat to the Nazi state.  (The Big Lie I’m sure lives in history for time immemorial, but in the 20th century its possession mainly lives in the hands of Adolf Hitler, who in the contemptible and contemptuous Mein Kampf  writes openly and at great length on the importance of using the Big Lie as a propaganda technique. He also recognized and copied the lessons he learned of the plagarized Czarist hate-tool The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, copying the essential elements of its propagandistic techniques. (The Big Lie was called so because it was so huge and incredible that its created statement was thought to be true  because “no one could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.)  This map then is one cartographic representation of the Big Lie.
    Propaganda_nazi_2

    The second map is a representational presentation of statistical data showing that tiny Germany could in no way be deemed the “Aggressor” nation in the beginning of the war given the colossally disproportionate amount of land masses between themselves and the British Empire.  If you didn’t think about this for more than one second, or if you just needed to believe it,  it would make sense. 

    On the other hand there is a class of maps (such as the following) which may well be very-lightly propagandistic.  (For a wonderful display and description of these maps see the superb bibliodyssey site) These maps are far more intelligent and intellectual than any of the propaganda maps I’ve looked at, and are more satirical in their approach to propaganda and their intent to influence thought and opnion than the outright lies represented in de facto propaganda maps.
    Propoaganda_mapshumorous
     

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

    —

  • The Longest Surrender in U.S. History—Native Americans and the Rationing of Food, 1870-1925 (+)

    JF Ptak Science Books LLC Post 140

    Blogindian_ration194

    These images of the Indian ration card and the Indian Police button were found opposite page 76 in the monumental Report on Indians Taxed and Indians Not Taxed in the United States (except Alaska) at the Eleventh Census 1890 (published in Washington DC in 1891, the best single-volume statement on the conditions of the Indian tribes in the U.S. in the 19th century). 

    Generally tribe members would wear the white ration card on a string and attached to a button.  When you see old photographs of the Indians queued up to receive their food and provisions, the little white cards stand in sharp contrast to everything else, when they are in focus,.  When not (as the lens weren’t necessarily fast enough to capture things in motion) they look semi-invisible, like a puff of smoke on the chests of so many people.  I can imagine then these people standing in line, waiting for food, having entered reservation life with enforced “sale” of their lands, still except for the fluttering of their ration cards, small white flags of surrender that they would fly for generations.  Certainly no other element of our society would be forced to surrender so often for the need of food.  And considering too the number of Indians who would die of starvation over decades’ time at the hands of this system and in the care of the federal government, it was a surrender that didn’t necessarily entitle them to the sort of treatment that a POW would receive.  (The following photo is of a queue for ration distribution at camp Supply, Oklahoma Territory, 1871.)
    Rationscamp_supply

    The amount of the ration was mysteriously worded, at least to me; I couldn’t really tell how much food people were allowed.  The explanation reads as follows:  “the table of quantity allowed to 100 rations is:  bacon, 10 pounds; beans, 3 pounds; beef (net) 150 pounds; baking powder, 1 pound; coffee, 4 pounds; ham, 50 pounds; salt, 2 pounds; soap, 2 pounds; sugar, 7 pounds; tobacco, ½ pound.”  (The salt part is curious; salt was very important, and ion relation to everything else, 2 pounds wasn’t really very much salt at all.  I am reminded of the very last part of the negotiations between John Ross, who was the principal chief representing the Cherokees, and the flatulent Gen.Winfield Scott, the head liaison between the Cherokees and the U.S. government, in the terrible last phases of the preparation for the Cherokee removal.  Ross pleaded, and in effect offered to buy, more provisions of salt for the walking winter journey for his 12,000 charges (children included).  That this was a point of negotiation is cruel and sickening.  Scott “gave in” and allowed the extra salt…his other practices in this enforced emigration though resulted in the deaths of about a third of the Cherokee people.  And Scott was about the best, most “Indian-friendly” general that the government had to offer.)

    It continues, badly written:  “Still, it frequently happens that issue same day finds the agency short of supplies and frequently rations are issued, and of limited quantity. 

    And closes:  “The Indian, however, arrives promptly on the appointed day, no matter whether he receives or not”. 

    Blogindian_ration_button195

    The button pictured here belonged to the uniform of the Indian Police. 
    It shows an Indian guiding a plow, with the legend written around the figure that reads:  “God helpeth those who help themselves”.  Or not. 

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • Artistic Display of Quantitative Data: the German Navy, 1912

    JF Ptak Science Books, LLC  Post #126

    Bloggermanwarships_2
    This lovely and invented panorama (40×28 inches, published 21 September 1912 in The Illustrated London News) was intended, I think, to display the extent and power of the German Navy in an easily digested view, reminding the viewer to be ever-vigilant, and not be afraid to have the British government spend more money on its own navy. 

    The print was titled “Instantly and Constantly Ready for War:  the Striking Force of the German Navy as it will be in the Near Future”.  It was drawn by Norman Wilkinson (1878-1971), a ubiquitous and very accomplished, quick-working artist (whose association with the ILN began in 1898 and would last past the Second World War), who also made a huge military contribution during WWI with his invention of dazzle camouflage (a sort of camo that used contrasting color in strong geometrical shapes on ships).  In any event Wilkinson hammered the message home with tremendous effectiveness, filling up this imaginary harbor with Britain-bombing German warships—this was far more understandable in human terms to actually see the threatening ships beyond their stark numbers.

    It is interesting to quote from Prime Minister Hon. R.L. Borden’s speech of 5 December 1912, responding to the German threat, in which he moved for leave to introduce Bill (No. 21) to authorize measures for increasing the effective naval forces of the Empire. 
    Bloggermanwarshipsdetai_2

    As follows:

    “Whereas in 1898 the German fleet consisted of:
    9 battleships (excluding coast defence vessels),
    3 large cruisers,
    28 small cruisers,
    113 torpedo boats, and
    25,000 men.
    maintained at an annual cost of £6,000,000,

    the full fleet of 1920 will consist of:
    41 battleships,
    20 large cruisers,
    40 small cruisers,
    144 torpedo boats,
    72 submarines, and
    101,500 men,
    estimated to be maintained at an annual cost of £23,000,000.


  • Graphical Display of Data—Picturing BIG Numbers, U.S. Aircraft Production in World War II

    JF Ptak Science Books  LLCBlogwwiiplanes

    This widely circulated and published photo appeared in 1942 (particularly in LIFE Magazine in 17 September 1942 and the Illustrated London News in the next month), and showed 4,500 aircraft models suspended from the ceiling of Chicago’s Union Station   It is the result of an inspiration derived from President Franklin Roosevelt’s assertion that America would produce 185,000 war-focused aircraft in 1942 and 1943. 

    The planes in this photo were hanging 60-feet above the floor of the station, with wing spans between one foot and four feet (for the bombers).  It was a fantastic, blustery, iconic effort to show what it meant to look at 4500 planes—and these paled in comparison to a drawing (which I unfortunately do not have) that appeared in the Illustrated London News on 21 February 1941, showing the entire production fleet of 185,000 aircraft—a column of planes one mile wide and 117 miles long.

    Blogworld_war_ii_airplanes_delano

    Using this photo then to interpolate that full production figure of 185k, you’d have to piece 48 of these photos together to show full production, or a version of this photo that was 8 inches wide and 32 feet long.  (The second image of Union Station and the planes is by FSA photographer Jack Delano.)