A Daily History of Holes, Dots, Lines, Science, History, Math, Physics, Art, the Unintentional Absurd, Architecture, Maps, Data Visualization, Blank and Missing Things, and so on. |1.6 million words, 7500 images, 4.9 million hits| Press & appearances in The Times, Le Figaro, Mensa, The Economist, The Guardian, Discovery News, Slate, Le Monde, Sci American Blogs, Le Pont, and many other places… 5000+ total posts since 2008.

Category: History of Lines

  • The History of Lines, an Introduction: Barbed Wire, Telegraphs, Treaties and Railroad Rails

    JF Ptak Science Books   Post 1539

    LINES--POLYTECHNIQUE566
    I’m about to start a series on this blog on a great constituent part of the concerns here of two other series: the History of Lines.  This new bit will sit along next to the History of Dots and the History of Holes, and will begin to mention just some of those things that will bridge the gap among the three categories. 

    LINES--POLYTECHNIQUE DET567

    A lot of that–the History of Lines business–has to do with the interpretation of things on paper:  heart rate, “brain waves”, the motion of a bumble bee, navigation, and of course, words.  (The great Kickapoo tracker Famous Shoes  in Larry McMurtry’s Streets of Laredo, one of the Lonesome Dove tetralogy, found that the one thing he couldn’t track in this world were the marks on the pages of a book.)

    The business of lines is like that of dots and circles, together describing much of the physical world.  For “lines” alone there’s just so much, an  entire encyclopedia waiting to be written. There are unique lines, such as we see below from The Scientific American for 28 March 1885, in a line of workers for the Edison Electric Company holding an (electric) torchlight parade, the men attached by electrical wires that were in turn attached to the electric light bulbs on their helmets.

    LINES-eLECTRIC TORCH568 There are lines of succession, code and graphs; Battle Lines, the Maginot Line; fishing lines, units of poetry, lines of a play; there’s waiting on lines, breaking the line, party lines; lines of fortifications, the lines on which music is written, and the foundations of geometry, and much more. 

     There were lines that occupied only a minute percentage of the landscape in which they were found, but were among its major controlling influences–such was the case in controlling the American West, except that one of the greatest of these lines, once completed and seemingly impenetrable, was briefly destroyed by its builders. 

    Barbed_wire The story of the West getting filled up in the 1870s is a story of lines—railroad track, telegraph wires, barbed wire fences, and words on a page; big changes from disparate but related areas in technology and legislation, but when you looked at them from a distance and in the proper perspective, they all looked exactly  the same.

    The greatest of these lines may have been the invention of barbed wire in 1873, with Joseph Glidden, Jacob Haish and Isaac Elwood all managing to independently come upon the idea at about the same time.  What barbed wire brought to the West was control and settlement.  Prior to barbed wire there was open range grazing of cattle and extensive cattle drives, mainly because there was no fencing. There were also few farms due to this sort of grazing—the only thing a farm was here was in the way, and there was no recourse for the farmer to protect his

    Blogludlowlands from a grazing herd.  There was no fencing because there were no materials for the fence.  Fencing was made almost entirely with lumber and stone, and on the treeless plains and the vast non-New England tracts of land, it was simply an impossible task.  The introduction of barbed wire changed all of this very quickly, with thousands of miles of new fencing strung in the 1870’s alone.  Fencing meant control, restriction of the use of land, of access to water, and to a way of life.  It also meant that the farmer was now free to make a claim at a way of life on the plains, beginning a torrent of settlement and farms.

    Another big line element of settlement were the texts (lines-on-paper)  of three major acts of legislation which, over a period of just sixteen years, were responsible for moving more people than just about anything else in American history. The first of these was the Homestead Act of 1862. This was a revolutionary concept, legislated in 1358 words, effectively turning over 270 million acres, or about 8 percent of the country, of public lands to private citizens (“actual settlers of the public domain”).  A claim could be made for a farm of 160 acres, for free, provided a structure was built on the land and it was maintained for five years.  One could buy the parcel outright for $1.25 an acre as well.   Next was the Desert Land Act of 1877 which opened drier lands, selling 640 acres at $1.25 an acre with three years to pay, so long as the land was irrigated by the end of the three years.  Land that was deemed “unfit for farming” was sold to those who might want to “timber and stone” (logging and mining) upon the land with the third major piece of legislation, the Timber and Land Act of 1878. The act was used by speculators who were able to get great expanses declared “unfit for farming” allowing them to increase their land holdings at minimal expense.  The Homestead Act alone accounted for the creation of almost 400,000 farms in the West by 1890.  Farms meant parceling out land, “settling” it, having people on it, waiting when they weren’t working. 

    Blogpeopling_upmillions_acres

    Settlement was dramatically increased by the written and published promises and speculations of mineral wealth—not necessarily just by the introduction of miners, but by securing the lands from and removing its Indian owners.  The Custer expedition into the Black Hills in 1873, for example, reported some hope for finding gold in the sacred mountains of the Sioux. Thousands of miners responded to possibility of wealth, and Custer was again dispatched to secure safety for them in the restricted lands.  This in turn lead to more settlers and coincidentally to the debacle of the Little Big Horn, which was the beginning of the end of the Siouian control over vast amounts of land.  From prospectors to protection to conflict, ultimately making land more available for more people. 

    The spread of the railroads was also an enormous settlement factor, with the number of miles of track being laid in Texas and the Great Plains doubling in just 5 years.  Not only could you get West more easily, and quickly, and with less pain and suffering, but you could also be much more easily re-supplied.
    Blogwestward_the_course_2

     

    Telegraph wires tripled, making it easier to control events:  and this means from being able to respond to Indian attacks more quickly to ordering boxes of nails, or beer, or shipments of newly-invented canned food. 

    One of the greatest and most infamous of these lines-controlling-the-West concept were the pieces of legislation and agreements and other legal and binding documents, between the U.S. government and every Indian tribe in the U.S. Promises were made to the Indians and of course not one of these treaties were ever actually realized.  It was these written lines that even the greatest of Indian intentions could not penetrate, and that in the end, after everything was said and done and written, after hundreds of treaties, not one was ever followed. 

    And at the end of tying the first metal ribbon across the country, the meeting of the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific railroads at Promontory Point (Utah) in 1869, after the locomotives  Jupiter and No. 119 touched cowcatchers, after the driving of the golden spike, after the completion of the massive effort to complete the railroad line, some men of the 21 U.S. Infantry (and others) hammered away at the rail to chip away some souvenir pieces of the occasion.  So, the moment the great undertaking was finished, it was put out of commission, possibly by a coronet player from the regimental band, or whomever.  Of course the line was only very briefly pu tout of service, and the damaged rails quickly replaced, but the folks celebrating the completion of the uniting of the rail line were the only ones who were really able to also prevent its completion. 

    Of course in the end all of the lines applied and enabling  the closing of the West were personified by smaller and more precise lines:  maps.

    NOTES

    The full text of the “Millions of Acres” (seen above) broadside is as follows:


  • Lines that Closed the West: Wire, Rail, and Words

    JF Ptak Science Books  Post 314

    The story of the West getting filled up in the 1870s is a story of lines—railroad track, telegraph wires, barbed wire fences, and words on a page; big changes from disparate but related areas in technology and legislation, but when you looked at them from a distance and in the proper perspective, they all looked exactly  the same.

    Barbed_wire

    The greatest of these lines may have been the invention of barbed wire in 1873, with Joseph Glidden, Jacob Haish and Isaac Elwood all managing to independently come upon the idea at about the same time.  What barbed wire brought to the West was control and settlement.  Prior to barbed wire there was open range grazing of cattle and extensive cattle drives, mainly because there was no fencing. There were also few farms due to this sort of grazing—the only thing a farm was here was in the way, and there was no recourse for the farmer to protect his

    lands from a grazing herd.  There was no fencing because there were no materials for the fence.  Fencing was made almost entirely with lumber and stone, and on the treeless plains and the vast non-New England tracts of land, it was simply an impossible task.  The introduction of barbed wire changed all of this very quickly, with thousands of miles of new fencing strung in the 1870’s alone.  Fencing meant control, restriction of the use of land, of access to water, and to a way of life.  It also meant that the farmer was now free to make a claim at a way of life on the plains, beginning a torrent of settlement and farms.

    Blogludlow

    Another big line element of settlement were the texts (lines-on-paper)  of three major acts of legislation which, over a period of just sixteen years, were responsible for moving more people than just about anything else in American history. The first of these was the Homestead Act of 1862. This was a revolutionary concept, legislated in 1358 words, effectively turning over 270 million acres, or about 8 percent of the country, of public lands to private citizens (“actual settlers of the public domain”).  A claim could be made for a farm of 160 acres, for free, provided a structure was built on the land and it was maintained for five years.  One could buy the parcel outright for $1.25 an acre as well.   Next was the Desert Land Act of 1877 which opened drier lands, selling 640 acres at $1.25 an acre with three years to pay, so long as the land was irrigated by the end of the three years.  Land that was deemed “unfit for farming” was sold to those who might want to “timber and stone” (logging and mining) upon the land with the third major piece of legislation, the Timber and Land Act of 1878. The act was used by speculators who were able to get great expanses declared “unfit for farming” allowing them to increase their land holdings at minimal expense.  The Homestead Act alone accounted for the creation of almost 400,000 farms in the West by 1890.  Farms meant parceling out land, “settling” it, having people on it, waiting when they weren’t working. 

    Blogpeopling_upmillions_acres

    Settlement was dramatically increased by the written and published promises and speculations of mineral wealth—not necessarily just by the introduction of miners, but by securing the lands from and removing its Indian owners.  The Custer expedition into the Black Hills in 1873, for example, reported some hope for finding gold in the sacred mountains of the Sioux. Thousands of miners responded to possibility of wealth, and Custer was again dispatched to secure safety for them in the restricted lands.  This in turn lead to more settlers and coincidentally to the debacle of the Little Big Horn, which was the beginning of the end of the Siouian control over vast amounts of land.  From prospectors to protection to conflict, ultimately making land more available for more people. 

    The spread of the railroads was also an enormous settlement factor, with the number of miles of track being laid in Texas and the Great Plains doubling in just 5 years.  Not only could you get West more easily, and quickly, and with less pain and suffering, but you could also be much more easily re-supplied.
    Blogwestward_the_course_2

     

    Telegraph wires tripled, making it easier to control events:  and this means from being able to respond to Indian attacks more quickly to ordering boxes of nails, or beer, or shipments of newly-invented canned food. 

    One of the greatest and most infamous of these lines-controlling-the-West concept were the pieces of legislation and agreements and other legal and binding documents, between the U.S. government and every Indian tribe in the U.S. Promises were made to the Indians and of course not one of these treaties were ever actually realized.  It was these written lines that even the greatest of Indian scouts could not track, mainly of course because they didn’t mean one bloody thing.  (The idea of words in a book, lines of words, being looked at as ‘tracks” to Indians belongs to Mr. Larry McMurtry, whose greatest of all Indian scouts, the Kickapoo Indian named Famous Shoes–from the Lonesome Dove tetralogy–could not ultimately track the words in a book as he was able to track everything else that lived in nature. Words/tracks of a treaty would’ve been ever more so impossible.)

    Of course in the end all of the lines applied and enabling  the closing of the West were personified by smaller and more precise lines:  maps.

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:


  • The Solids in Uccello

    JF Ptak Science Books

    Blogsan_romano
    My ueber-brilliant wife, Patti Digh, has for decades been fascinated by the monstrous-great William Gaddis, and in particular, by his novel The Recognitions.  It is a difficult book to feel at home in—it took me four tries to feel comfortable in this complex wristbender, but once in, the water was fine, and I finished it during a boring and largely vacant astronomy meeting in Pittsburgh years ago.  It is perhaps one of the best books written by an American in the 20th century, and among the many threads that wind their way through the 950 pages, one involves
    the gorgeous 15th century painter, Paolo Uccello.   Uccello, in short, was one of the first Renaissance painters to (re)discover and paint using perspective, and did so magnificently.  Gaddis refers cryptically, however, to the “solids in Uccello”. 
    Dsc04733
    Books on perspective are some of the most beautifully illustrated works ever printed. They are full of insight and detail—a detail, the seeing of which, is a mystery (and to Uccello, mystical) beauty, a submerged, geological magnificence that is also an extraordinarily powerful tool.

    I wrote two posts or so ago about the importance of Leonardo’s illustrations to Pacioli’s work on perspective, and how this was really about the first time that geometrical figures were illustrated , published, for the first time, in perspective.  And of course the images were drop-dead gorgeous. 

    Vredeman de Vries (Perspectiva) was a 17th century Dutchman who is perhaps one of my favorites—shown here is his projection for an open loggia in which an illusionary ceiling could be painted (in the manner of Andrea Pozzo’s The Transmisson of the Divine Spirit (1688-1694) , an extraordinary painting of tremendous depth on the curved vault of S. Ignazzio in Rome).   (Another example of de Vries at bottom is a simple perspective of diverse architectural forms.) 

    Dsc04734 Wenzel Jamnitzer’s Perspectiva corporum regularium (1568) is a somewhat earlier work of great depth and beauty—this image is again just a “simple” arrangement of geometrical objects, but there’s really nothing very “simple” about it.  The forms are difficult and arranged in a difficult presentation, and rendering them in perspective was a great achievement, and I think a wonder for the mid-16thc mind to see. 

    Brook Taylor’s simple, clean lines and presentation of these architectural forms from his New Principles of Linear Perspective (2nd edition, London, 1719) is another perspective miracle of the 18th century.  To me the lines of perspective showing the view of the objections connected to the spare presentation of the objects themselves look completely modern to me rather than being a technical treatise from 289 years ago.Dsc04729 ,

    Uccello understood all of this, and painted using these techniques with enormous power.  The “solids’ recognized by Gaddis (and not really discussed) are incredible to me.  Looking at his painting Battle of San Romano  (1457) we see Perspective in her place; when we look at, say, the rumps of the horses, we see almost no detail, just a mass of color, a solid, with spectacular plainness. What in the world was he thinking?  He could certainly have painted the horse and the other solids with texture and detail, but he didn’t, and to me it seems antithetical to the painting.  What in the name of all motherly things was he thinking?  And who else on earth was using such huge amounts of plain solids in their paintings?  I’m not aware that anyone else was, and I am relatively clueless as to why he did it, abandoning Blogsan_romano_rump as it were the potentials of the beauty of excruciating detail that we see in these other works. 

    I would love to know what Uccello was thinking when he decided to create that mass of color, that solid, when there was no one else doing exactly that.  But my major thanks go to Patti Digh for loving that, and to Mr. Gaddis for creating the question.

     

    ·Posted by :

    ·in:

    —