WWI Photography US in London detail
WWI Photography Catalog

The Fine Print

« Two Minutes to Doomsday: "Get out of Hell Free" Card, 1957. Armageddon and All That... | Main

Comments

Jeff

She looks unhappy. He looks worried. Many explanations come to mind ...

jasper

The Greyhound, in heraldry, is used to signify a number of positive personal attributes including such things as loyalty and courage.

The dog is also used to denote nobility. The 'de' in the surname is indicative of such a status.


Jeff

Also, the man might be struggling against a taller, domineering wife. It looks as if she might be wearing Army boots. Wearing the armor could be like Bush wearing the flight suit. I know it's a stylized image, not a domestic one, but still, it's hard not to read something into this one.

John F. Ptak

Jeff: she *does* look worried, and if you look at the print very closely you can see that her eyes are indeed open, and looking down to the side. I'm a little annoyed with myself for publishing this without a real commentary; I just gave up too quickly.
Jasper: THANKS! I knew that the dog had a positive attribute, but I've just never noticed someone actually standing on a dog--plenty of folks standing on open books, weapons, flowers and so on; dragons of course; but not a dog. And a little one at that.

Jeff

At first, I took it that she was unhappy and he was worried, as might happen if he were unfaithful and she were mad. However, Jasper's insight that the greyhound could mean loyalty might hint that it is the other way around. Either way, he's still too short and she wears Army boots.

John F. Ptak

True all the way around, Jeff. The first thing that Patti said when she looked at the print was that the guy was standing on the dog because he was short. And the woman, you're right, was probably wearing those giant Brooklyn Bridge lifty shoes that the non-royal classes were forbidden to wear. I think that they were either put to death, or maybe they could wear them if they were prostitutes? Memory failing...

John F. Ptak

True all the way around, Jeff. The first thing that Patti said when she looked at the print was that the guy was standing on the dog because he was short. And the woman, you're right, was probably wearing those giant Brooklyn Bridge lifty shoes that the non-royal classes were forbidden to wear. I think that they were either put to death, or maybe they could wear them if they were prostitutes? Memory failing...

John F. Ptak

True all the way around, Jeff. The first thing that Patti said when she looked at the print was that the guy was standing on the dog because he was short. And the woman, you're right, was probably wearing those giant Brooklyn Bridge lifty shoes that the non-royal classes were forbidden to wear. I think that they were either put to death, or maybe they could wear them if they were prostitutes? Memory failing...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories