JF Ptak Science Books

Images from A. Kircher's "Mundus Subterraneus", 1668

JF Ptak Science Books  Post 2471

In the bookstore section of this blog I'm offering for sale some engravings from Athanasius Kircher's Mundus subterraneus... (1678) which, in spite of its title, explores/classifies/theorizes on the grand scheme of all creation, hardly limited to just the world going on underground.  Kircher (who has appeared on this blog numerous times, simply enter his name in the Google search box at left and you'll find many entries) approaches the nature of terrestrial heat, volcanoes, the origins of lakes and rivers, optics, fossils/agates (in "de lapide philosopherum"), distillation, alchemy, ocean currents, insects, plant life, and so on, a real summa cum laude  tour de force, Kircher being the Renaissance man's Renaissance man.

• Follow this link to the blog's bookstore post for these images.

• http://longstreet.typepad.com/books/2015/06/images-from-a-kirchers-mundus-subterraneus-1668.html

All images are printed on 14 3/4 x 8 7/8" sheets (375x220mm) and have been removed from a defeated and dead copy of the book, the full title of which is Athanasii Kircheri ... Mundus subterraneus, in XII libros digestus: quo divinum subterrestris mundi opificium, mira ergasteriorum naturae in eo distributio ... universae denique naturae maiestatis & divitiae summa rerum varietate exponuntur ...   This copy (lacking the title page and much else) I believe was printed in Amsterdam in 1668 (I believe--the other somewhat later editions to 1678 that I have checked all seem to have added material and different and later pagination, leading me to believe that this is an earlier edition.) The pagination ran 346+487pp, being two volumes printed as one.

For a later, full-text version of the 1678 edition, see the University of Heidelberg, here.

• Please keep in mind that the scans leave off the top 1.5" or so of each image--the paper was simply too long for the scanner bed. The pages are complete (in real life).

And so the list (of 18), thus far:

Fabrica Furnorum (pg 239, in the chapter "De Origine Alchymiae")

 

Ex Chymicis Manuscriptis Fraus detecta (in the chapter "De Alchymia Sophistica", pg 293)

Image 6x7 1/2", 150x195mm 

(Alchemical Furnaces), opposite page 391, volume 2, in the chapter "Arte Stalactic sive Distillatoria"

Image 13x8", 335x205mm.

 ("Alchemical Furnaces") in the chapter "De Fodinarum Conditionibus" (page 213):

Image  4x7". 

Statue of Liberty/Death: Thomas Nast and the NYC Harbor

JF Ptak Science Books  Post 2470

 Thomas Nast (1840-1902) was a very busy and very gifted social observer, working at Harper's Weekly for decades, seemingly contributing about one large and one small image per week for more than a thousand weeks.  He created the iconic images that we know today: the Tammany Tiger, the popular image of Santa Claus, the Republican Elephant, and (though not entirely) the Democratic Donkey, and much else. When Boss Tweed famously declared that he didn't care what newspapers wrote about him and his criminal triumphs because his constituency couldn't read, Nast took him to task by portraying him in a visual way in which reading was not necessary, and which lead to Tweed's downfall.  He had some weak spots (the Pope was a favorite target, as were the Irish and the Chinese), but he was a champion of equalities, depicting brutal treatment of African Americans, ranting against conglomerates, campaigning for public education, ripping nasty politicians, goring favoritism, spotlighting thew living and working conditions of the working poor, and the like.  The man had a huge following, and helped guide social reforms and popular opinion. 

I have a collection of many hundreds of these images, and I must say that I do not recall seeing any work dedicated to the environment in general--save for this very striking image, depicting Lady Liberty as Lady Death, presiding over a cesspoolish NYC harbor.  It appeared as a double page spread in the April 2, 1881 issue of Harper's Weekly, and it no doubt left an indelible impression on its viewers. 

• The original image is available here at the blog's bookstore.

A Giant's Giant: Fr. Kircher, 1668.

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

[Detail of below]

The wonderful and occasionally problematic Fr. Athanasius Kircher (addressed numerous times in this blog, just check out a search under his name in the Google box at left) inferred by "anthropomorphic calculus" (so says Jan Bondesman, in A Cabinet of Medical Curiosities, pg 82) the size a human/giant must have been to accommodate (for example) an elephant tooth. So instead of dinosaurs you'd get these enormous creatures many time larger than a "Homo ordinarius"--as you can see in the scale, we have the enormous creature flanked by "homo ordinarius", then Goliath (still puny), "Helvetius Gygas", and "Gygas Mauritanius", all quite tiny compared to the big boy, who stood 200 cubits. (A cubit was a measure from he elbow to the fingertips, so depending on where you were, the cubit could be 17-20 inches or so; in any event the giant would have been 300-400 feet tall.) This image appears in Kircher's great Mundus subterraneus, quo universaw denique naturae divitae, published in 1668.

• This original image is available for purchase via the blog's bookstore, here.

{This is a detail from the full image, following]

 

Houghton Miflin Suing on Behalf of Hitler and "Mein Kampf" (1939)

JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2469

This "critical" edition of Hitler's Mein Kampf was published in a 32-page tabloid format, editing in the choice bits, and adding critical commentary and interpretation, whittling Hitler's 270,000 words down to 70,000, and including sections that were evidently heinous and omitted from other English versions.

Noram Publishing Company of Greenwich, Connecticut, loudly proclaims "Not One Cent to Hitler" so far as royalties go (and make no mistake he did make a fair amount of money on the book outside of Germany, while making a lot inside Germany). Any profits were to go the refugees of Hitler's Germany. 

Interestingly Noram Publishing Company was the creation of journalist and future Senator Alan Cranston and a business associate, Amster Spiro (city editor of William Randolph Hearst's New York Journal-American). 

• An interesting account of Cranston's involvement is in this article by attorney John Aquino. Also see here for an article in the Los Angles Times.

The problem was that Mein Kampf  was already published in full form in the U.S. by Houghton Miflin (among others), and Noram's shortcut was interfering with their business. And so Houghton Miflin successfully sued Noram¹, forcing the company to destroy the 500,000 copies of their tabloid that hadn't yet sold (about half of the print run to that point). 

On the other hand Cranston and Spiro did reach at least a half-million people with their version, which importantly discusses the concept of the Big Lie, with "The Only Lie Worth Telling is the Colossal One".

Notes

1.  "Houghton Mifflin Co. v. Noram Pub. Co., 28 F. Supp. 676 (S.D.N.Y 1939).U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York - 28 F. Supp. 676 (S.D.N.Y 1939)
July 14, 1939

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 14, 1939.

28 F. Supp. 676 (1939)

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN CO.
v.
NORAM PUB. CO., Inc., et al.

*677 Hines, Rearick, Dorr & Hammond, of New York City (Archie O. Dawson and John D. Mooney, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Hoguet, Neary & Campbell, of New York City (Walter H. Free, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion for a temporary injunction to restrain infringement of the copyright which the plaintiff claims to have of the book "Mein Kampf" (author, Adolf Hitler)."

Early "Image" of Hiroshima--as a Cartoon

JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post         Part of the Atomic and Nuclear Weapons series

The Chicago Daily Tribune covered the Hiroshima bombing of 6 August with a number of different articles, including statements from the Enola Gay crew members, explanations of how atomic bombs "worked" from the physics aspects, President Truman's bearing on the proceedings, news of a number of other B-29's ready and waiting to be sent on missions with similar bombs, and so on.  That "so on" doesn't actually include that much coverage at this stage, amounting probably to two or three full pages of text. There were no pictures yet though there were reports of images made from the aircraft showing 4 square miles of total devastation at Hiroshima. 

The only illustration to speak of was this--a very graphic graphic to be sure, which under the circumstances, I suspect was to be expected. 

 

Infographic: the Sizes of Air Forces, 1918-1935

JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

More work here from the great G.H. Davis--a man whose work has been shared on this blog dozens of times (check this out in the Google search box to the left)--this time showing the changes in air corps from the end of WWII to the middle of the 1930's. The infographic was published October 26, 1935, in the Illustrated London News, five months after the creation of the Luftwaffe and just a short time longer than that for the renunciation of Versailles.  Hitler was two years in power, and the face of Europe was really about to change...

 

Isaac Newton, Alpha and Omega

JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

For many years I've had this double-portrait (as it were) of Isaac Newton, an alpha and omega image: it depicts the window of the room in which Newton was born in Woolsthorpe (near Grantham), and then the last portrait made of him in life.  The portrait is very well known; the view of the window with the pure holy light, not so very much.

 

The 1% in 1910 and 2014

JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2469

It is always difficult comparing value of objects over periods of time--this is especially so when trying to compare the value of wealth, in general. And so I won't be tempted to much to do this while relating the data of this interesting and tiny handout, The Distribution of Wealth in the United States, 1910. It was published in 1912 by Edward G. Hewitt (who curiously locates himself in "Brooklyn Borough", rather than just "Brooklyn" or the "Borough of Brooklyn", the incorporation taking place 14 years earlier) and presented in a bit of an odd way, at least to me, dividing the wealth into groups of families. It makes it a little hard to understand, even if there are only 22 divisions to the analysis.

What attracted my attention in this was the number of millionaire families, which was 7,737 in the total of 18,434,837 families--or about .4%--with an aggregate wealth of $26.9 billion, which was a 22.6% share of the national wealth stated at $115,000,000,000. That millionaires club would be about $24 million in 2014 dollars, using the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator.

Secondly, the much-discussed 1% here totaled 189,237 families with wealth of over $62,500, or about $1,494,545 or so in 2014 dollars.

Since "wealth" really isn't defined here it is difficult for me to extrapolate the differences between the 1% of 1910 and the 1% of 2015--especially so since I've seen several different current interpretations of what the modern 1% actually means.

In 1910 there were 7,737 families of millionaire status--today there are something like 5.4 million millionaires in the U.S., though that is counted as individuals, or about 1.6% of the population compared to .4% in 1910. And as my friend Jeff Donlan points out, it would be more useful to talk about the 24-millionaires club than simple millionaires, but I don't have access to that data, at least not for this half-hour post.  

It is interesting that The Economist in 2012 stated that the average household income of the 1% was $1.2m in 2008, according to federal tax data. I find it very surprising that the 1910 1% (adjusted by BLS) comes in at $1.49m.

Again, this is all sorts of problematic, but even though stumbling around like I am here with these numbers it is very curious to see how closely those 1% numbers from 1910 and 2014 come together. It feels like this is wrong on many or all levels, and the 1910 data might all be junk for all I know, and that it is like saying that the stars are all the same size because that's what it looks like here on Earth, but it is strange about how those numbers worked out--at least here, using the stated data.  I'm not saying that what I'm saying above has any value beyond indicating that there may be something interesting here...

Powerful Design--Smithereens, 1943

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

The Texaco Company was not kidding around when they expressed appreciation for their customers who still bought their product when available after rationing restrictions--they addressed their customers and showed them the result of channeling their rationed petroleum into the production of TNT. The graphic is the result of Texaco applying themselves to the war effort, and they did not want their current and future customers to forget it.  

[Source: LIFE magazine, November 15 , 1943.]

 Additionally, in a similar vein and from later in the year in LIFE,  comes this from Shell Oil:

I'm perfectly okay with the "fly...high and spy" part.

Great Cover Design--Massiveness and City Profiles

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

This fine design belongs to the Cincinnati Shaper Company (Cincinnati, Ohio and "Pioneers of he Steel Press Brake") Catalog B-1, displaying and promoting their massive and extremely powerful machines for forming shapes in metal.  These were true and beautiful beasts of machinery, ready to punch and curve and trim and notch all manner of metal.  And the cover of their catalog gets that point across very nicely:

...which is a detail from:

Socialism, Civilization, and Fertilizer...and Nazis (1945)

JF Ptak Science Books  Quick Post

Such is the state of American society as seen in this brochure (published in 1945), except that the order of concern in the title may be inverted.  A Warning to Americans that "State Socialism" is on its way, coming in forms of not-really-identified Senate Bill 882 and H.R. 2922, which were efforts by Alabama Senators Hill and Bankhead and Virginia congressman Flannagan to introduce federal projects in producing and creating reserves of phosphate and potash.  Seeing at how very heavily and importantly fertilizer is established in the pages of his pamphlet I can only assume that the unnamed source for it was a major producer of U.S. fertilizer which did not care for the introduction of a federal hand and so portrayed it as a wash of socialism.

Actually it was worse than that.  After establishing that fertilizer really helped to win WWII, and how important it was in agriculture, and then repeating how essential it is to all aspects of life, and then repeating that, the author(s)  seemed to ramp  up the hyperbole a notch:

One thing is for certain--the pamphlet is a pretty potent piece of lobbying. 

 

The World's First Journal Devoted to the Computer

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

I was grazing in the warehouse and came upon this terrific volume: Mathematical Tables and Aids to Computation (volume 1&2, 1943-1947). It is the collection of the first two volumes of the world's first journal devoted to the computer, with a big gap in publication caused of course by WWII. There are a number of gems in the 900-odd pages in this volume, including the following papers. (Note that all of the below and more are readable online from Utah at of the MTAC, here.)

• G. R. Stibitz "Should Automatic Computers be Large or Small?"
• 3 tight pages on the first appearance in English on the Zuse Z4 computer (1947, "This may be the earliest published description of Zuse's early computers available to post-World-War-II researchers outside of Germany and Switzerland. See \cite{Ceruzzi:1981:ECK} in an histcomput.bib for many more details)", 
• J. H. Curtiss "A Symposium of Large Scale Digital Calculating Machinery" (April 1947), 
• G. R. Stibitz "Film Slide Rule" (October 1947), 
•  L. J. C(omrie), "The Application of Commercial Calculating Machines to Scientific Computing" (April 1946), 
• H. H. Goldstine and Adele Goldstine "The Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC)" (July 1946), 
• R. C. A(rchibald) "Conference on Advanced Computation Techniques" (April 1946), 
• W. G. Bickley and N. W. McLachlan "Mathieu functions of integral order and their tabulation" (January 1946),  
• W. J. Eckert "Mathematical Tables on Punched Cards" (October 1945), 
• J. S. Frame "Machines for solving algebraic equations" (January 1945),

and more. See math.utah.edu for a very full and link-filled list of the papers.

• The volume is available for purchase int he blog's bookstore, here.  

 

Votes for Women, 1872: "When we vote we'll fix those terrible men"

JF Ptak Science Books   Post 2468

In-between research bits I've been spending some time moving around in the Levy Sheet Music Collection at Johns Hopkins--there's a lot of interesting stuff and it has a pretty big online footprint.  I've been working on an alphabet of illustrated sheet music covers having to do with the Moon, and collecting some images for tanks and aeroplanes--and just yesterday I posted a great piece of sheet music on the telephone (from 1877).  

Source: Levy Sheet Music Collection, Johns Hopkins, here: http://levysheetmusic.mse.jhu.edu/catalog/levy:016.127

The unfortunate piece of this is that while searching "Moon" I bumped into a number of severely racist covers. This has happened before, doing benign searches on "comet" and "stars" and such, looking for the physical sciences in pop music in the early 20th century, and finding racist covers among the few bona fide examples located.  It certainly speaks to an endemic and deep racism in general when you can depict a meteor with a terrible caricature of an African American, or a song called  "If the Man in the Moon was a Coon".  Taking this a little further I did a search under "coon" and found over 100 non-repeating titles with covers from this collection--many of the covers are astonishingly bad. (Another search on an even more odious word turns up more examples.) On the one had they speak to a searing but very accepting and casual race-hatred and are a lesson in themselves, especially when you can scroll through them all in a single pass. On the other hand, I don't want to be in such close public proximity to these horrible things.  

The path regarding posting those covers is not clear.

In the meantime I would like to share this fantastic womens' suffrage sheet music, published early on (1872) in the fight for the vote, though the lyrics are much more confrontation than the cover art.  (Except of course that the very imagery of women at a polling station--an event mostly entirely not allowed in the U.S. until 1919--which would have been jarring on its own to nearly any uninspired man looking at it.)  Remember too that this is only three years after the first national suffrage organizations were founded (one by Susan B. Anthony and the other by Lucy Stone), so the national attitude towards the idea of women voting as a popular movement was still quite young.

The lyrics paint a fairly dismal picture for women, "trodden underfoot we've always been", "locked up like slaves", "wretched", "treated with contempt and scorn". On the other hand when given the right to vote, the refrain at the end of each of teh four stanzas is the same save one word describing men:

"When we vote we'll fix those terrible men". The "cruelest knaves" are then  referred to as "those dreadful men", "those wicked men", and then finally as "those awful men".  Probably this was not so far from the truth.

 

The Wondrous Telephone--Sheet Music from 1877

JF Ptak Science Books   Quick Post

Just a year after the invention of the telephone appeared this wonderful piece of music--with great cover art that actually took a pretty strong and accurate look into the future.  In 1877 we are told in the lyrics that "all of our secrets will be known" which isn't such a great thing, and that the "prattle of the distant Mothern' Law" will become fully available; on the other hand, "the whole world" will be united , and that in the end "we will never be alone" because of the telephone.  For a quick sonnet to the new invention the lyricist invoked a number of fair insights into the future of the telephone.

SOURCE: Johns Hopkins University,  http://levysheetmusic.mse.jhu.edu/catalog/levy:032.121

And the lyrics: