JF Ptak Science Books Post 2262
In an interesting article in Popular Science Monthly (volume 44, December 1893) Helen Zimmern reviews the work and vision of positivist-criminologist Cesare Lombroso's Criminal Woman. Lombroso was a believer in certain bits of investigation and experimentation that he took as science. He examined the physical characteristics of criminals and made aggressive assumptions on how the shared statistics of visual clues could elucidate the character of a person. He measured all sorts of things in prisoners--head shape, skull capacity, all manner of other body part measurement,s hearing ability, strengths,m weaknesses. color determination, acuity, agility, sagacity of facial features, and on and on, and was fairly well satisfied that he had unlocked a code of criminality determined by mostly visual interpretation--in effect, a naked-eye DNA. It was certainly in keeping with the time and the belief in New Statistics. Most of it was bunk, dangerous, and useless.
IT was all taken as a science of sorts at the time, and Ms. Zimmern reviewed the Lombroso work as a scientific, evidentiary document. Mostly the conclusion are sad and wilting.
Here's a bit from the review, followed by a couple of links to other works in English by Lambroso.
“...on tattooing in women, the tendency to tattoo being, according to Lombroso, an infallible indication of criminal tendencies.”--Cesare Lombroso, "Criminal Woman" review, page 221.
Continue reading "A Sad Bit on Positivist Criminology, 1893 (And on Women & Tattoos)" »